:)
finally the order, and so its definitely not precedent in any manner
TEM NO.26 COURT NO.1 SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO(s). 8 OF 2009(FOR PREL.HEARING)
AJITH D Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,exemption from filing O.T.,directions)
Date: 23/02/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
Heard.
The writ petition is dismissed.
(G.V.Ramana) (Veera Verma)
Court Master Court Master
KAFILA - COLLECTIVE EXPLORATIONS SINCE 2006 
You mean, this is all there is?
Wow!
LikeLike
Hi, I don’t understand what this means, could you please translate it into simple english for us common folk :) ?
ie, was the petition to quash the defamation suit against Ajit dismissed, or was the defamation case dismissed? Thanks.
LikeLike
The supreme court / high courts judges do not dare to disclose theirs assets ! Why ? The people see the mirror to watch their faces . The judiciary must be like a mirror but it hides its face ! Why ?
The Judiciary under the shadow of fundamentalists should not snatch the fundamental right of expression of the masses .
There must be dialogue . If you stop the dialogue between the opponents then the peace will be in danger .
LikeLike