All posts by Nivedita Menon

When Vermin Stare Back – Cockroach Janta Party and the Possibility of Reversal: Viraj Kafle

This is a guest post by VIRAJ  KAFLE

For years, a particular grammar was offered to the young.

It taught them to recognise an internal enemy — Muslims, left activists, social justice advocates, critics of the regime — and to treat their presence as contamination by measuring them against a narrow standard of productivity and usefulness. This grammar operated by sorting populations according to their perceived contribution to a narrowly defined productive order. It marked as contaminants those bodies and capacities that appeared to drain resources, require adjustments, or fail to generate efficient returns.

What was once directed primarily at designated communities has now begun to expand. Continue reading When Vermin Stare Back – Cockroach Janta Party and the Possibility of Reversal: Viraj Kafle

Cockroach Janta Party – a turning point for a dying democracy?

At Jantar Mantar

As I was leaving the protest site of the Cockroach Janta Party at Jantar Mantar where I had gone to express solidarity – on July 5th, the sixteenth day of the struggle – a young man who had also just stepped out, approached me to ask the way to the nearest Metro station. I was not sure myself, so I suggested he feed it into the map on his phone, which he was holding. He laughed and said “hum gaanv se hain, lagta hai ki kisi se poochna hi achha hai.” (I’m from the village, I always feel it’s better to ask someone)

I replied “main toh ek alag hi peedhi se hoon, mujhe bhi kisi se poochna behtar lagta hai” (I am from a different generation altogether, I too prefer to ask someone).

United in our spatio-temporal dislocation, we then got directions from some other passerby, and walked together for a bit till I reached my car.  Was he a student, I asked.  He turned out to be from Ayodhya, running a small business in Faridabad. He had decided to come to Jantar Mantar and meet the “bacche” (although he was not much more than a baccha himself) because he wanted to be there to show support for their struggle. He couldn’t study much himself, and although he was happy running his small business, he said kabhi kabhi lagta hai ki zyaada padh paata toh business hi aur achhi tareeke se kar paata.  Mujhe padhna achha lagta tha…” (Sometimes I feel if I could have studied a bit more I could have even run my business better. I used to enjoy studying).

He had come all the way from Faridabad, when he could spare some time on a Sunday, to meet these other young people who had  captured his imagination with their guts and determination. As for this easy, fleeting camaraderie between two strangers of different generations and genders and class locations in a city like Delhi – what was it? Where did it come from? It was not entirely unfamiliar. It was the kind of connection sparked by the magic of collective struggle against injustice – it is a sense of safety, and inexplicable familiarity, of home and hope. We all felt this magic in the encampments against the CAA – at Shaheen Bagh, Khajoori and many other sites, and in other cities and towns.

And you feel it at Jantar Mantar where The Cockroach Janta Party is starting its twentieth day of protest today, demanding the resignation of the Education Minister for the large scale collapse of the entrance exam system nation-wide. Sonam Wangchuk has now been on hunger strike for the twelfth day today, as have some 18 to 20 students from different student organisations (mostly from AISA), from different universities in Delhi, and from different states. They have come from Tamil Nadu, and Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, and they are on the hunger strike too. Some of the students have had to be hospitalized since the the tenth day or so, but others have since joined in.  The young hunger strikers look wan and pinched,  but beam broadly, their faces glowing with purpose. They make jokes, they make you laugh, and they fill your heart with hope and pride.

Hundreds of others are milling about, and some of them are parents. One young woman whose child was only in middle school had been there every day, she told me. “They are fighting for the future of our children, no?”

It is now the stuff of legend – how a relatively unknown young man, Abhijeet Dipke, in a moment of anger at the massive corruption in the entrance exam system, set up a funny meme satirically taking on proudly the insulting name given to young people who question the government, by the Chief Justice of India. Because Dipke called it a “party” to mirror the acronym of the BJP, it sparked enormous excitement among the younger generation, the responses online were overwhelming, he decided to come back from the USA to protest at Jantar Mantar, and called on all young people to join him there.

An older Left oriented generation watched in some bewilderment and suspicion (there was the usual cynicism about AAP, with which Dipke had been associated; suspicion about Wangchuk –  why was he released from prison so quickly, is this the BJP’s B team?).  But the protest took off on the ground with thousands of students and young people on the first few days; the CJP was joined from the first day by the ecological warrior from Ladakh, Sonam Wangchuk, and by Left student organisations. Soon, leaders of the CPI(M), CPI (ML) and Trinamool and of the farmers’ movement, were seen at Jantar Mantar publicly expressing solidarity, as were many other individuals and organizations known by their political activism and their writing, to be opposed to the Hindutva corporate regime. This regime has now acquired the kind of suffocating, monopolistic, systemic power unimaginable in the democracy that was India; power directed in the last instance by the shadowy, wealthy, Brahminical organization with no accountability whatsoever to any authority or to the people of India – the RSS.

The issue – education

The financial corruption at every level in the BJP-RSS ecosystem (manifest even in the Ram Temple), has been suspected in the education sector very clearly for over a decade. Substantial rumours abound of faculty appointments in public universities through cash payments (it is not sufficient to be an actual RSS activist – that is only the minimum requirement). Selection of security agencies is also said to involve money changing hands (and the budget allocation for security is now triple what is spent on libraries in public universities.) I speak of rumours, because there has not been the kind of full exposure  that we see with the Ram Temple, but the blatant daylight robbery at the temple suggest that the stories circulating about lesser institutions (mere universities as opposed to the house of god) must be true.

A young school student Sarthak Sidhant was able to track online, the ways in which CBSE modified its criteria for tenders to favour a blacklisted edutech company that handled the On Screen Marking System, which turned out to be a complete disaster. The role of edutech companies by the way, is explicitly fostered by the NEP to set exams, conduct evaluations, and run online courses. These are private, profit making organizations, which are now to take on many of the key functions of publicly funded universities.

If the venerable CBSE has shown itself to be rotten to the core, there is no doubt that the opaque National Testing Agency (NTA) – set up  in 2017 as a centralized institution to replace all other forms of evaluation that educational boards and institutions have set up over time – is completely compromised too. It is not a government institution (unlike UGC and CBSE) but a “registered society”, an autonomous body under the Ministry of Education. Teachers and teachers’ associations have predicted from the very moment of the setting up of NTA , and the rolling out of the National Education Policy in 2020 (NEP 2020), the very outcomes we see today.

The JNU Teachers’ Association issued a statement in June 2026, analysing the rot since the NTA was set up and NEP rolled out. Titled “Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here”, it concluded by demanding that

the NEP 2020 must be immediately rolled back to protect the future of India’s students, the NTA must be immediately scrapped to save the autonomy of public universities and the Union Minister of Education, Mr Dharmendra Pradhan must immediately resign to save the integrity of education system in India.

The NTA since its inception has an unbroken record of exam leaks, manipulations and cancellations. There have been more than 40 paper leaks in the last five years, an unprecedented number. Each leak has put money in pockets, and each leak has resulted in suicides of young students.

Those of us who have participated in exam paper setting at NTA have often remarked that despite the flourishes of security protocols (searches, passwords, leaving phones outside etc), how easy it would be for NTA employees to gain control of the papers. Initially many of us boycotted the process as we wanted to continue with the entrance exam the way JNU faculty have conducted it since 1970. All India exam centres, exams to be written in any of the official Indian languages, not a single leak in all these decades. Essay type questions where candidates were assessed not for “flowery English” as a NITI Ayog member said, (defending Multiple Choice Questions as testing intelligence, not “mugging”), but for showing interest in the discipline and expressing whatever their views were on an issue, in their own ways. Eventually we ended the boycott because we didn’t want to push ourselves out of the entrance exam process. And discovered that the process of MCQ paper setting has its own logic.

MCQs require multiple sets of question papers of 100s of questions to be set supposedly to ensure that nobody knows which paper will actually be used, but what this means is that even a sincere paper setter trying to test thought rather than information, runs out of creative questions, and is reduced to setting questions that are simply about dates and places. However, since the NTA also compensated us for our time with substantial fees for paper setting (which was part of our normal duties when we did it at the university), not every paper setter, to put it mildly, has been sincere. (Many of these were the eager new faculty appointments whose trajectory we mentioned earlier). So MCQs at their best, as seen in the CUET, are precisely about mugging. And evidently, the NTA exam setters now resort directly to getting AI to do the job,  as happened with the UGC NET Sociology paper. Remember, these paper setters are faculty from universities, who are paid an extra fee over and above their salaries to do this work.

(This morning we learn in addition that this paper was leaked. The leaked pdf document matches the internal template used at NTA for preparing question banks.)

The rampant impunity at every level has now reached levels of absurdity.

Teachers argued that the NEP was a blueprint for saffronized and corporatized education. Its plan to merge schools with lower numbers of students was intended to shut down schools. And indeed this policy of “rationalization” led to the shutting down of 93,000 schools all over India in the decade 2014 to 2025.

There has been drastic transformation of curricula across universities partly driven by the kind of semi literate common sense that governs India today, and partly by design, intended to end any critical thinking whatsoever.

For teachers’ critiques of

NTA see  The National Testing Agency is a scam – shut it down now! Ayesha Kidwai

NEP, see  NEP 2020 – elitist and corporatized education under Hindu Rashtra: Nivedita Menon

MCQs see Does the MCQ Format Work For Social Sciences and Humanities Entrance Examinations? Ayesha Kidwai and Nivedita Menon

In short, this regime wants to end access to publicly funded education, to end critical thinking, and to produce our young people as a cheap labour pool for the rapacious global economy. The NEP says proudly that we will train young people to hold three or four jobs in a lifetime – an education policy that celebrates precarity!

Back to Jantar Mantar

There is a crack, a crack in everything -, that’s how the light gets in…

Leonard Cohen’s words come to mind. What we see at Jantar Mantar is a crack in the darkness that has descended on us, ever more heavily, over the past decade.

The Cockroach Janta Party has tapped into the anger and resentment and despair of young people over exam leaks, but that’s not all this is. The young people we see at Jantar Mantar and all over the country (NSUI has apparently independently of CJP, been conducting militant demonstrations in many cities), are using the leaks to speak about democracy and secularism and social justice.  Jai Bhim and Inquilab Zindabad and Hindu Muslim ki Rajneeti Nahin Chalegi. And Meri Life Meri Marzi, slogans about sexuality but also Bharat Mata ki Jai – all of these ring out at the protests.

These young people have grown up in this regime, they have come to adulthood in a dispensation that normalises hate and dispossession of the poor and powerless, and yet they are not normalised, not disciplined into this regime. The universities have been the centre of protests over issues ranging from fee hikes, to sexual violence, library facilities, reconstructions of syllabi along Hindutva lines, ecological questions to do with the campus and beyond. No wonder the NEP is structured to end all of this unrest forever.

The CJP is by no means a homogeneous platform, it is a coalition that has come together over one issue – education. There are internal differences on other issues, but those need not be raised here, at this time, and they are not. This is the form of successful non-party mobilisation we saw in the late 1990s to early 21st century – citizens coming together over Hindu right-wing violence or workers’ rights, or in  opposition to nuclear energy and the nuclear bomb – broad platforms of individuals and organizations that did not agree on everything, but worked on that one issue and marched together for a while.

As a young student activist Puranjai wrote earlier, when the CJP was conducting protests but the Jantar Mantar sit-in had not yet begun:

If one is able to imagine the protest site as something other than that of a unilinear flow of information, if one is able to design a setup other than the stage and the road, one might be able to move towards more just alternatives. By rallying around the cause of a more inclusive India, one can build solidarities that might not have been possible before. This present moment holds promise and one need not sit away from it.

Everything is not joyous and celebratory and militant all the time at Jantar Mantar.  A parent, a sibling of one of the students on hunger strike arrived the day I was there, they try to keep up a brave front. There is an overlying sadness about the students who committed suicide.  Since the mainstream media studiously avoids any reference to this extraordinary protest, most of our information is from social media. We see some of the grief stricken parents arrive, they meet Abhijeet, they cry.  We see Abhijeet’s eyes fill with tears, he struggles to control himself. We cannot forget how young they are, these heroes of our democracy, who remind us what it is to be principled,  determined and undaunted – but also vulnerable and human.

A local dog has joined the protest, he feels at home in that community. I am reminded of the massive anti fee hike student marches of 2019, about which I have earlier written.  In one of these, starting from JNU, a dog from Ganga Dhaba had decided to accompany her friends, passing through barricades, running along with them, she marched with them all the way to Jor Bagh. It was a carnival we found there, when some faculty arrived to express solidarity, Music and singing and energizing chants. Suddenly the street lights were switched off, and everyone knew in that moment of darkness that the lathi charge was about to begin. The two students I was chatting with, moved of one accord. They dashed off to find the dog, and as I stepped to the side, my heart pounding at the knowledge of what was to come, protected from it by my age and status as faculty (though the lathis did fall on two of our male colleagues), I saw the two women emerge from the crowd, carrying their friend, running, stumbling, the dog safely in their arms.

They carried her back to campus.

Our young people know and practice the truth of vasudhaiva kutumbakam, the slogan made meaningless by RSS functionaries, including the Prime Minister and Home Minister.

On the day I was at Jantar Mantar, I met Sonam Wangchuk too, briefly. He was reading something, and looked up courteously as I introduced myself as a teacher. It was the 8th day of his fast, he was clear-eyed and smiling. What do you teach, he asked me.

Political Theory, I said.

He raised his fist and smiled teasingly – ” We are doing the practice”.

Every single force in our country that resists corporatized Hindu Rashtra needs to see this moment as one that breaks the hopeless pall of doom that we have been experiencing. As the BJP breaks up party after party to gain the majority in parliament that the people did not give it in 2024; as the ongoing SIR disenfranchises large numbers of Indians; as election after election is managed for the BJP by the ECI; and the courts fail us time after time, falling in line with the government – militant and peaceful civil disobedience might be the only weapon against a regime that has swallowed every institution, ending up more powerful, more vicious and unethical, than the colonial government ever was.

The CJP at this time has one single powerful demand – the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The arrogance and lack of accountability of this regime is such that Pradhan dismissed the CJP protest as “a B Team of disruptive elements”.

Can these audacious young people take back India for us?

Not by themselves perhaps, but what if every single oppositional force is part of the push? And as more and more sections join in,  perhaps another demand can be added – the dissolution of the current Election Commission of India; the repeal of amendments that gave the government complete control over appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, and immunity to election commissioners from legal proceedings for decisions made in their official capacity;  in short, the restoration of the previous autonomous  – and accountable – status of the ECI.

Can a larger mass campaign endorse the CJP’s demand for the resignation of the Education Minister but also go beyond, to the fundamental issue of elections managed by the ECI for the current regime?

CJP and us – The Mirror to the “Nation”: Puranjai

Guest Post by PURANJAI

Image of June 6th protest in Delhi courtesy The Hindustan Gazette

The social media phenomenon Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has been doing a series of protests now, its demand being the resignation of the education minister Dharmendra Pradhan. A lot of people have been writing on it, focusing on an analysis of its various features as well as the response of the state. It has opened interesting points for discussion. However, for this present space, I would be restricting myself to an analysis of the mirror it has held up to our society.

It is no secret, now that we are surviving Prime Minister Modi’s  third term that the government which quells any protest before it even really begins, gave a very tolerant treatment to the CJP organisers of as well as the protesters. While many have written their own explanations about it, I believe, considering the already initiated vilification and censorship campaign against Abhijit Dipke and the stationing of vast number of police forces at Jantar Mantar and Sansad Marg (I was there on 6 June) that the reason for such a tolerant treatment lies in numbers and content. The government could be said to be testing the translation of online resentment into physical spaces which would be a more precise gauge of the phenomenon. Without allowing the permission to even protest, it would have sent a very visible message of authoritarian tendencies.

The government couldn’t have risked denying the permission since it was being widely covered by the non-mainstream media and the middle-class was talking about it. This is in my opinion a very important aspect to note about it. The middle-class which has the necessary social capital to create narratives is very important to a government. It is this class which receives the media and political attention in moments of crisis. It is this class which is able to hegemonise empathy in a direction it sees desirable. Moreover, it does all of this without actively organising and politicising to a certain end.

This middle-class stays silent when bulldozers demolish homes of poor and the socially marginalised. Even when lakhs of names are removed from the electoral roll and subsequent attempts are being daily made to snatch citizenship of fellow human beings, it stays silent or gives active support to such actions. It stays largely regressive on the question of social justice and has a worldview of caring only for raising one’s own income levels. This section which should otherwise act as the one aggressively moving the country forward in all democratic aspects fails to do its duty to the country. It is this class residing in the strategic location of the capital and surrounding areas that the BJP could not afford to antagonise. Once it turns up in large numbers (much to the dismay of the dispensation), it chose to tolerate and perhaps might even accept the very minimum and technocratic demands in the future.

This section which is largely composed of socially privileged Hindus easily stakes claim to the ‘Nation’. The chanting of “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, “Vande Mataram”, the cricket team’s blue jersey, the A.R. Rehman version of Vande Mataram, the tricolour and above all the stress on the tool of peaceful protest; these all are symbols not created by the BJP even as it utilises these quite effectively. Today these are seen as visible symbols of nationalism (for most of which several people have been killed as well) and interestingly, their history predates the BJP’s history itself. Most of these symbols and mental frameworks are drawn from the Congress-dominated freedom struggle. It arose from a socially privileged  (and in some cases anti-Muslim) Hindu section of the population, came to occupy a hegemonic position across the country and stand in for a necessary sporting of the idea of nationalism.

This nationalism is comfortably sported by this middle-class that came to protest. Without the display of politics that challenges the establishment in some way and props up an alternative, the BJP finds it difficult to reply to this. For there are no Muslims as the face of CJP to be labelled as from Pakistan. Nor are there seemingly any “Khalistanis” to slander and arrest. Nor are there any structure-shaking demands being made by this middle-class and its CJP leadership. Till now, all the characterisations (of “exam-reform”) and the one single demand are all within the acceptable fold of nationalism that BJP is comfortable with. Yes, Ambedkar and Bhagat Singh are present in symbolic forms at the site as well, but without their radical challenge to the status-quo. It would be important to recall that the RSS-BJP has conveniently appropriated these symbols while invisibilising their message.

All of this, tells something about us constituting the middle-class. More than what it tells about the protest or the government, I believe this phenomenon displays an interesting aspect about us. Broken by caste, stunted by patriarchy and alienated by capitalism, we are not able to form an organic solidarity with the people of our country. While the social fabric of our country gets torn with every passing day, while class divide continues to dehumanise us every moment, we comfortably turn our eyes away (or perhaps some of us revel seeing these injustices continue). That we only gather together and wear the abstract concept of nationalism on our sleeves when our own economic interests are in peril is not a thing to be proud of.

Consider the revolutionary slogan of “Inquilab Zindabad” which I saw the people comfortably shouting at the site. But what is the content of this inquilab? Does it include the response to privatisation and centralisation of education, of the various caste and gender discriminations that happen in our educational spaces or even before one reaches (or not reaches) these spaces? Does it design a future for the adivasis and the Muslims? Do all of these figure in our idea of an alternative India?

Everyday, we see people getting lynched, kidnapped, tortured, maimed, discriminated against, silenced, assaulted, raped. No abstract concept of the nation is made available to these people within which they could wrap their concrete realities and thus show to the society for recognition and acknowledgement. It is really interesting to note that the tricolour and “Saare Jahan se accha Hindustan humara” did not save the protesters at Shaheen Bagh. For them was reserved the jail, the lathi, the bullet and the ultimate tag of “anti-national”. When the socially-privileged Hindus use it though, it is a different matter.

My pessimism only stretches till that of the intellect and I believe that however the past has been or the current limitations of the movement, one can transcend it if one desires. It has been long that the idea of India has been hegemonised by a select few. The far-right in India banks on it and creates an even unjust idea everyday through the mechanisms of the RSS. However, the present moment has provided an opportunity. As the establishment parties fail to provide any sustainable alternative to the status-quo, it has fallen on the people to design one. By being in dialogue with each other, the people of India can craft a democratic alternative. The government hates people talking to each other as fellow human beings. It would rather have us scrolling reels and liking the ridiculous Melody memes.

At a moment like this, physical mobilisations can be used to enter dialogue, rather than merely reducing the people to an audience which repeats outworn slogans. If one is able to imagine the protest site as something other than that of a unilinear flow of information, if one is able to design a setup other than the stage and the road, one might be able to move towards more just alternatives. By rallying around the cause of a more inclusive India, one can build solidarities that might not have been possible before. This present moment holds promise and one need not sit away from it. We must cautiously engage, if only to at least honestly try to enter a democratic dialogue with scope of emancipation. I maintain an optimism if not in the stage, at least in the people.

Puranjai is a PhD scholar at JNU

Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here: JNU Teachers’ Association

Teachers and their representative bodies have long been pointing out the disasters inherent in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 as well as specifically the scam of the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the central role given to EdTech companies in the NEP.  EdTech companies are to offer courses apart from testing (we have seen how well that has gone!)  thus eventually replacing universities and schools altogether.

Here we post the statement by Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association, issued last week in the context of the collapse of India’s examination system.

Links to two relevant earlier posts on Kafila:

The National Testing Agency is a scam – shut it down now! Ayesha Kidwai

NEP 2020 – elitist and corporatized education under Hindu Rashtra: Nivedita Menon

Statement by JNUTA (6th June 2026)

The JNU Teachers’ Association and the larger community engaged in teaching and learning across the country have been consistently writing and cautioning the government that the move toward over-centralization in the Indian education system was against the federal structure of India and would result in the erosion of academic integrity in the country. The current state of the education system serves as a grim validation of these warnings, proving that the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the NEP 2020 are direct attacks on the constitutional, social, and the academic fabric of our educational system. JNUTA had time and again reiterated that for a country as geographically and socially diverse as India and where education is a Concurrent List subject, increased centralization in the hands of NTA has been a recipe for disaster. Despite evidence of zero academic competence, the NTA which was established as a registered society in 2018 under the MoE, was brazenly entrusted with the future of crores of students, replacing University’s own entrance exams and those conducted by specialized bodies like the AICTE, CSIR, UGC, ICAR, and NCHM. Continue reading Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here: JNU Teachers’ Association

Principal’s endorsement of Women’s Reservation Bill on a party platform unacceptable: Statement by LSR students

Public statement by LSR students

The students of Lady Shri Ram College for Women—a large number of them filling the area outside auditorium, the corridor, the entire staircase and many even outside under the sun—started the protest not because we are against the Women’s Reservation Bill, but because the video of the Principal of the college was posted on the BJP4India official Instagram page. As a college that touts that it is apolitical and does not allow students to organise political events, the students found this extremely hypocritical. In the 15 minutes of the claimed “transparent dialogue” that happened yesterday, we were told by the Principal that she recorded the video for the Ministry of Women and Child Development and that it was posted on the BJP4India page without her consent. On further questions about if she contacted the page regarding it being posted without her consent, she said, “No”. Continue reading Principal’s endorsement of Women’s Reservation Bill on a party platform unacceptable: Statement by LSR students

Deified Bodies, Diminished Rights – A Critical Anatomy of the ‘Divyang’ Discourse: Viraj Kafle

Guest Post by VIRAJ KAFLE 

The landscape of disability rights in India underwent a seismic shift on December 27, 2015, not through a legislative amendment or a landmark judicial decree, but via a radio broadcast. During his Mann Ki Baat program, Prime Minister Narendra Modi suggested that the term viklang be replaced with divyang. While ostensibly a move to alter societal mindsets and reduce stigma, this nomenclature shift signaled a profound reorientation of the state’s relationship with its disabled citizenry. This declaration of “divinity” arrived a full year before the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act of 2016 was actually passed, effectively setting a paternalistic tone for the rights-based framework that followed.

By invoking “divinity” to describe physical or sensory impairments, the discourse moved disability from a hard-won, rights-based framework into a deified, body-focused model that prioritizes symbolic elevation over material accessibility. As disability activist Nidhi Goyal has argued, this is merely a new way to tell the disabled they are “not normal”—moving them from “abnormal” to “supernormal,” but never simply equal. It is generally accepted that to be disabled is to be “disabled by society,” yet the divyang narrative replaces this political recognition with an abject surrender to divinity that reflects a forced consent of the disabled to their own marginalization. Continue reading Deified Bodies, Diminished Rights – A Critical Anatomy of the ‘Divyang’ Discourse: Viraj Kafle

Belief in contemporary India: an essay in the constitutive imagination: R Srivatsan

Guest post by R. Srivatsan

Contemporary India is something of a conundrum for most political theorists.  What is it?  How does it hang together?  What do people believe in?  Given the large canvas, I’d like to focus here on one small aspect of belief in Hinduism and Hindutva today.  Towards this objective, I’ll take up a somewhat old pronouncement by the foremost BJP leader and prime minister, in 2014, during a conference of doctors and other professionals that there must have been plastic surgeons in ancient India who attached an elephant’s head on a human body and created Ganesha.  And, that Karna’s extra uterine birth suggested that there was a knowledge of the science of genetics during that period.  The scientific community and those adept at history were appalled, rolling their eyes in dismay at the confusion between true history and mythology.  Is such a response, i.e., a scorn or embarrassment about the unscientificity of the claim regarding the existence of these ancient sciences/events, adequate to the statement made?  Did the prime minister actually believe this?  What is it that is being said by Hindutva politicians, ideologues and thinkers when such pronouncements are made, or for example, that vedic mathematics was the progenitor of mathematics as a discipline?  And what about the rewriting of history books to valorize the Hindu past, erasing a “dark medieval period” and denigrating Muslim “invaders”? Continue reading Belief in contemporary India: an essay in the constitutive imagination: R Srivatsan

Phantom students and the new university: Viraj Kafle

Guest Post by VIRAJ KAFLE

It is a common sight to see professors today wandering through the corridors of our premier universities with a look of quiet desperation, but they should instead be offering prayers of thanks to the students who never show up. We have reached a peak of administrative efficiency where the traditional classroom, built to house a modest forty souls, is now legally mandated to accommodate sixty or even eighty. This logistical miracle, where two bodies are expected to occupy the space of one, is only possible because of the profound civic duty exercised by the truant. By choosing the comfort of their beds over the cramped benches of the lecture hall, these absent students prevent a literal stampede. They are the only thing standing between a smooth seminar and a public health crisis.

Continue reading Phantom students and the new university: Viraj Kafle

Pedagogical Reflections on Silence in the Classroom: Rekha* and Rahul*

Guest post by  Rekha and Rahul (pseudonyms).

Two early-career teachers in private universities in India reflect on what has quietly transformed in their classrooms over the last few years, as they trace the rise of a new norm of ‘silence’. Their reflections ask what it means to teach in the intimate classroom space as it begins to mirror the shrinking democratic space and what forms of care, courage and pedagogy might keep the classroom thinking in these changing times. 

I

In the last half a decade, i’ve felt my classroom in a private Indian university change in ways that are hard to capture through the usual metrics. The checklist  is enviable: i retain full freedom to design courses, assign authors i want and structure electives around questions that matter to me.  And yet, in one of the courses while teaching Margaret Canovan’s piece on ‘Two Faces of Democracy’, i realised what had changed. There is a subtle paradox: the formal freedoms of the private university remain in place, but the informal ecology of the classrooms has altered. 

Continue reading Pedagogical Reflections on Silence in the Classroom: Rekha* and Rahul*

SIR must be stopped until reconsidered and reworked – Jury report on public hearing in Delhi

A National Convention on Defending Universal Adult Franchise, convened by Bharat Jodo Abhiyan, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), took place at the Constitution Club, New Delhi, on 20 December, 2025. At this National Convention, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being carried out by the Election Commission of India in different states of India was discussed. About two hundred persons, including many witnesses, attended the Convention and were part of the audience. We post below the report of the jury

 Conclusion of the jury:

After hearing the testimonies, the jury is of the view that the revision of electoral rolls is being carried out hastily and sometimes carelessly. The possibility of mass disenfranchisement is, therefore, real and ominous. It is imperative for the process to be fair and accurate; all eligible voters must be duly registered and should be able to exercise their right to vote. To fulfil these basic requirements, the SIR process needs to be reconsidered and reworked, and until that is done, in the interim, it must be stopped.

Jury members:  Justice Madan Lokur (Retd.), Justice A.K. Patnaik (Retd.), Ms. Pamela Philipose, Dr. Jean Drèze, Prof. Nivedita Menon (Retd.)

Report of the jury

At the National Convention, we as members of the jury heard Continue reading SIR must be stopped until reconsidered and reworked – Jury report on public hearing in Delhi

Delhi Declaration: Reject SIR, Reclaim Universal Adult Franchise

We, people’s movements, peoples’ organisations and citizens from across India, express our deep concern at the undemocratic, unconstitutional and illegal deletions of crores of voters under the guise of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. We confront the largest ever disenfranchisement in the history of any democracy. We face a challenge to the universality of the universal adult franchise — the foundational achievement of our freedom struggle.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has weaponised a seemingly routine administrative exercise into an unprecedented and sweeping rewriting of the rules of who can be a voter.

This tectonic shift in the country’s electoral architecture was introduced without a constitutional amendment, without public or legislative debate, and without any change in the statutory rules or even the ECI’s own Election Manual. This has resulted into a double whammy for the people of India. First, the responsibility for inclusion on the voters’ list has been shifted from the State to the citizen. Second, the presumption of citizenship has been overturned. These provisions fly in the face of the letter and the spirit of our constitution, are a case of wanton abuse of law, disregard of the judicial pronouncements and the ECI’s own established norms of transparency, accountability and fairness.

The experience of Bihar stands as a stark warning. The SIR unfolded as a chaotic exercise in bureaucratic overreach that imposed impossible demands on the frontline election staff and needless misery for ordinary people. There is ample evidence that the SIR in Bihar failed every quality test of electoral roll revision: completeness, equity and accuracy. The population–elector ratio declined sharply, resulting in a net reduction of forty-five lakh names from the voters’ list. The burden of exclusions fell disproportionately on the poor, migrants, minorities and women. Meanwhile, inaccuracies in the voters list remained unresolved—duplicated entries, blank records, gibberish data and bulk voters at single addresses persisted.

Yet, instead of learning from this disaster, the Election Commission has chosen to go ahead with SIR in the rest of the country. Evidence from the second phase of SIR shows that more than eleven crore voters now face the threat of disenfranchisement—because they could not submit forms on time, or because they could not trace themselves to an arbitrarily set qualifying electoral rolls of 2002 or 2003. The burden has fallen once more on the most vulnerable, especially women, migrants, dalit, adivasis, nomadic and trans communities and the religious minorities, mainly the Muslims. Again, impossible deadlines have been imposed on inadequately trained and overburdened BLOs, leading to multiple tragic cases of their deaths and suicides.

This runs counter to the consultative and inclusive spirit that the ECI has upheld for decades
and deepens the suspicion that this mass exclusion is being carried out at the behest of the
ruling dispensation. The Election Commission faces a crisis of credibility like never before, as the lines dividing the Commission, the Government and the ruling party have been blurred.

In a democracy voters choose their government. A democracy loses all meaning if the government is allowed to choose its voters. That is the abyss the SIR is leading India into.

Therefore, this Convention demands that:

Continue reading Delhi Declaration: Reject SIR, Reclaim Universal Adult Franchise

JNU – The State of the University: JNU Teachers’ Association

Report prepared by Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association

 (October 7, 2025 – updated version of report first released in September 2023)

Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has suffered terribly under the effects of the concerted attack it has faced since February 2016. The vicious campaign slandering the image of the institution, its faculty, and its students, that was unleashed at that point of time was only the beginning of a long drawn process of sapping the institution of the vital energies that underlay its remarkable achievements and earned the institution such great prestige across the country and the world. What followed that attack has been a systematic process of undermining the institution from ‘within’, with the office of the Vice Chancellor serving as its hotbed. The current and the previous occupant of that office have shared the responsibility for this. Even as old wounds continue to fester, new injuries continue to be inflicted on the institution’s body politic – whereby JNU is being subjected to a process of death by a thousand cuts. This is happening despite the current Vice Chancellor being an alumna of the University.

In the last one decade, the terms ‘governance’ and ‘leadership’ have been turned on their heads to acquire rather ominous meanings, whereby they have in effect become synonyms for their antonyms. From being a ‘public’ institution in which the quest for knowledge and learning in all its dimensions thrives through the lives of its students and faculty, the University has been steadily pushed in the direction of being reduced to being an expression of the Vice Chancellor’s persona, into a fiefdom in which the writ of the occupant of that office reigns supreme. Displaying utter contempt for institutional norms and statutory provisions that made for democratic self-governance and orderly functioning, a centralised, arbitrary and dictatorial mode of (mis)governance was put in place, which tolerated no questioning of decisions. Currently, the JNU Administration under the leadership of the Vice Chancellor is waging a war against the University faculty. Continue reading JNU – The State of the University: JNU Teachers’ Association

The hopeless quest for a pure incorruptible knowledge – decoloniality and its discontents

[This post by Nivedita Menon is the fourth essay of the series in Kafila titled Decolonial Imaginations. Links to the previous essays are given at the end.

The terms ‘decolonization’ or ‘decolonial’ have become quite critical now, given that the impulse of justice lies at the core of these concepts. Neither postcolonial nor decolonial perspectives are compatible with right-wing ideologies but the fact that Hindutva ideologues in India and the rightwing globally are now trying to appropriate that language makes it seem to some that the very idea of the postcolonial or decolonial is suspect. We believe that this demonizing of decolonial theory from a position defensive of the European Enlightenment needs to be unpacked in the interests of a mutually productive debate. Kafila will be publishing a series of interventions on what the idea of the decolonial imagination involves, locating decolonial theory as speaking from the margins, drawing attention to identities which the orthodox Left subsumed under ‘class’ and which the rightwing in India seeks to assimilate into Brahminism. Additionally the orthodox left’s rejection of spiritual beliefs and inability to engage with them is also a factor that may have produced the space for right wing appropriations of a field marked “religion”. 

We hope that these interventions will clear the ground for productive conversations on the left rather than polarised and accusatory claims.]

Introduction

As Hindutva ideologues and the rightwing globally, appropriate the idea of “decolonising”, it seems to many opposed to these trends, that scholarship around decoloniality is itself the problem. Such arguments tie in with earlier ongoing attacks on postcolonial scholarship since the 1990s that virtually accuse it of directly contributing to the rise of the right. Decolonial scholarship is relatively a new arrival in the Anglophone world (since the 2000s), and ever since the rightwing started using that language, the same charges are laid at its door as well. Indeed, the implication (and sometimes outright allegation) is that decolonial/postcolonial scholars were secretly rightwing all along.

This charge I will address in a somewhat different way in the first section, by way of analogies with other bodies of knowledge.

The second section will address another related critique of decolonial thought, that it is “merely epistemic” and does not consider the materiality of structures of power

Finally we will ask the question – when Hindutva claims to be “decolonising”, what is it doing exactly? Continue reading The hopeless quest for a pure incorruptible knowledge – decoloniality and its discontents

Lady Shri Ram College Students’ Union statement on former diplomat’s remarks

LSR graduates express outrage at former diplomat’s comments at the college

Over 500 graduates of Lady Shri Ram College (University of Delhi),  released a statement of outrage at the communal and misogynist statements of former IFS officer Deepak Vohra at an event held at the college on September 11, 2025

The statement and full list of signatories is below.

As proud alumnae of Lady Shri Ram College across the globe, we condemn the recent episode concerning Deepak Vohra in the strongest possible terms and call upon the college, and its senior management to explain how this came to happen.

This week, Lady Shri Ram College invited a retired diplomat Deepak Vohra, who freely articulated misogynist and communal views without being challenged at a lecture on college premises. He made openly anti-Muslim comments, told the young women in the audience that their roles were primarily that of mothers of future citizens, directed wholly inappropriate remarks to the principal of the college from the stage thereby insulting also the institution she heads.  And yet, there was no censure or objection expressed at the event itself and students were not even allowed to walk out in protest.

Lady Shri Ram College (LSR) is not simply an undergraduate women’s college, it stands for a vision of a world in which women have space to explore their interests and capabilities and rests on the legacy of a newly democratic India that chose to make world class higher education accessible to women from a diversity of backgrounds. LSR as an institution exists to actively enable such a vision. Despite the deeply patriarchal contexts many students come from, LSR gives them the space to experiment with ideas, explore freedoms, be inspired by other women, all outside the constant censorious gaze of men.  The teaching in the classroom has always been of an excellent standard, and outside it, there are a host of enrichment activities that makes an LSR education the well-rounded experience it should be. Continue reading LSR graduates express outrage at former diplomat’s comments at the college

Anti-colonial Thought and the Global Right – An untenable alliance: Ishan Fouzdar

Guest Post by ISHAN FOUZDAR

[This post is the third essay of the series in Kafila titled Decolonial Imaginations. Links to the previous essays are given at the end.

The terms ‘decolonization’ or ‘decolonial’ have become quite critical now, given that the impulse of justice lies at the core of these concepts. Neither postcolonial nor decolonial perspectives are compatible with right-wing ideologies but the fact that Hindutva ideologues in India and the rightwing globally are now trying to appropriate that language makes it seem to some that the very idea of the postcolonial or decolonial is suspect. We believe that this demonizing of decolonial theory from a position defensive of the European Enlightenment needs to be unpacked in the interests of a mutually productive debate. Kafila will be publishing a series of interventions on what the idea of the decolonial imagination involves, locating decolonial theory as speaking from the margins, drawing attention to identities which the orthodox Left subsumed under ‘class’ and which the rightwing in India seeks to assimilate into Brahminism. Additionally the orthodox left’s rejection of spiritual beliefs and inability to engage with them is also a factor that may have produced the space for right wing appropriations of a field marked “religion”. 

We hope that these interventions will clear the ground for productive conversations on the left rather than polarised and accusatory claims.]

Introduction

Anti-colonial thought is under attack. Some scholars have accused decolonial and postcolonial theories of nativism. Interestingly, the phenomenon that provoked this accusation is stranger than the accusation itself. The global North and the global South have witnessed an unlikely alliance of anti-colonial rhetoric and right-wing discourse. While the Hindu Right in India deems Muslims to be colonial invaders, the Right Wing in Europe constructs the influx of refugees as a colonial invasion, which will lead to a ‘great replacement’ of White Europeans by West Asian and African refugees. The solution – ‘decolonise’ by expelling the colonisers and reviving the ‘glorious’ ‘indigenous’ past. This invokes several questions: How do European right-wing groups lay claims on decolonisation? Are there common links between these right-wing ‘decolonisation’ projects? More importantly, does the presence of anti-colonial language in right-wing discourse automatically translate to the conclusion that postcolonial and decolonial theories are inherently nativist?

I undertake two broad tasks. First, I lay forth the ‘anti-colonial’ rhetoric of these right-wing projects. Secondly, I condense their similarities and use them to show why anti-colonial thought should not be seen to be irredeemably polluted by this misappropriation.

Before I trace the right-wing appropriation of anti-colonial language, a caveat about the usage of the terms anti-colonial, postcolonial and decolonial is in order. I use anti-colonial thought to broadly bundle postcolonial and decolonial theories. The reason being that both theoretical schools present varying critiques of the socio-cultural and intellectual legacies of colonialism. The difference in the kind of critique separates postcolonialism from decolonial theory. Continue reading Anti-colonial Thought and the Global Right – An untenable alliance: Ishan Fouzdar

The Man Who Died at Gate Number Three: Avantika Tewari

This is a guest post by AVANTIKA TEWARI

It was night when the man died.

In the thick, humming night of a city that never truly sleeps — only flickers. Flickers between traffic signals and app pings, between delivery promises and the quiet violence of exhaustion.

He collapsed just beyond Gate Number Three in a residential colony in Delhi, somewhere between the parked dumpers and the weary under-construction site of the Metro.

He fell softly, without spectacle. The kind of death a city absorbs without noticing, like rain into dust.

In a few days, the Resident Welfare Association had drafted a statement — not out of grief, but out of inconvenience: “What if it had been one of us?”

The question hung in the air like a perfume of moral panic. A swift and bloodless message was delivered — the dumpers, it was agreed, would no longer be stationed near Gate Number Three. Continue reading The Man Who Died at Gate Number Three: Avantika Tewari

Urgent Call for Peace by Indian and Pakistani Feminists​

The ceasefire is just the first step in the long walk to justice and peace​

In a show of historic cross-border feminist solidarity for peace, over 10 organizations and approximately 1000 people have come together to issue a powerful statement calling for immediate de-escalation, dialogue, and justice in the wake of renewed hostilities between the two nations. The signatories include feminists, peace activists, artists, journalists, academics, students, grassroots organizers and  other professionals from India and Pakistan.

11 May 2025

We, feminists from India and Pakistan, unequivocally welcome the ceasefire declared by our two nations today. The tension and escalation of the last fortnight remind us of how fragile peace is. The ceasefire is also a vindication of calls for de-escalation and peace by lakhs of ordinary people on both sides of the border. Even as we hope this indicates an absolute cessation of hostilities, we recall the recent events. 

We condemn the terror attack in Pahalgam that killed 25 tourists visiting Kashmir from different parts of India and one from Nepal. One local person also lost his life in the Pahalgam attack. The targeted attacks deepened the communal divide between Muslims and Hindus in India and were exploited to incite hatred, fear, and calls for collective punishment.

In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, it is the women—including as mothers, daughters, sisters, wives—who are left holding the unbearable weight of grief. Instead of respecting and sharing it, it has been weaponized and policed—especially when it refuses to follow the script of hate. Himanshi Narwal, the young widow of one of the slain victims, was among the survivors who amid unimaginable pain still found the strength to appeal for peace. She asked people not to direct their rage against Kashmiris and Muslims who, like her, are trapped in a cycle of violence they did not create. For that simple act of humanity, she has been trolled, vilified, and attacked by chest-thumping nationalists more committed to blood lust than truth. 

Continue reading Urgent Call for Peace by Indian and Pakistani Feminists​

Condemn censorship – The Wire’s website blocked

Citizens of a democracy have the right to information even during times of conflict and war. The Wire has been one of the few news news portals left over these years of state repression, that has stood firm, carrying out this responsibility ethically and courageously.

Today the Editor Siddharth Varadarajan issued a statement on the blocking of access to The Wire by the government of India.

While television channels ignite themselves with mindless jingoism and bloodthirsty rants, even irresponsibly carrying out real time coverage of operations putting lives of armed forces and civilians in danger, what has been banned? The news portal that has seriously and quietly carried out the task of purveying information and analysis, in this difficult time.

A strong statement has been issued by DIGIPUB News India Foundation, of which The Wire is a founding member, and the declared objective of which is to “help ensure the creation of a healthy and robust news ecosystem for the digital age. “

The statement reads:

DIGIPUB strongly condemns the blocking of The Wire’s website
DIGIPUB’s founding member The Wire has released a statement on Friday, May 9 stating that the access to their website has been blocked by some Internet Service Providers following government orders. One of the ISPs says the block has been done by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting under the IT Act, 2000.
If the Indian government has indeed blocked access to The Wire, then it is a blatant attack on press freedom. Silencing independent media doesn’t protect democracy—it weakens it.
This is a critical time for the nation and such actions impede rational thinking. The urgency and horrors of battle cannot be used as an excuse to silence independent journalism.
A free media is the best antidote to misinformation and fake news, DIGIPUB strongly condemns this attempt to suppress journalism. We demand the immediate reversal of such censorship, the orders for which have not even been made public. The Indian Government must uphold constitutional values of free speech and restore unrestricted access to independent media—democracy cannot survive in silence.

As a collective, Kafila stands in solidarity with The Wire and calls upon all democratic forces and voices to speak up against censorship, to stay calm and united for peace, and to reject and resist the bloodthirsty politics that has brought the region to the edge of catastrophe. We join our voices with other citizens of Southasia calling on both governments to de-escalate tensions, turn decisively towards diplomacy and ensure peace in the region.

Concerns arising from the suicide of Atul Subhash – A feminist response: Naveddu Nilladiddare, Karnataka

Statement by Naveddu Nilladiddare, Karnataka, a state wide network of organisations and individuals concerned with issues related to women and all human rights

The tragic suicides of Atul Subhash and police constable, Tippanna Alagur in Karnataka have once again given rise to volatile debates on the ‘misuse’ of the laws related to gender violence specifically the (erstwhile) IPC 498 A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has provoked a PIL in the Supreme Court that seeks reform of these laws to “prevent harassment of Innocent husbands.”  It has also given space for irrational and dangerous fears being unleashed by men’s rights organisations and a sensational media about “greedy and exploitative” women who are a threat to the institution of the family with their rapacious demands for maintenance and alimony. Even the Home Minister of Karnataka has legitimised these fears stating that the suicide has “opened up a debate about men’s rights” in the country.  These statements and debates betray an ignorance of the processes of law in addition to a denial of violent patriarchy that continues to impact on the lives and deaths of women and men. 

Continue reading Concerns arising from the suicide of Atul Subhash – A feminist response: Naveddu Nilladiddare, Karnataka

Salaam Anita! 1958 – 2024

Anita Ghai with friends on her birthday in 2021

Anita Ghai (October 23, 1958 – December 11, 2024) psychology scholar and practitioner, feminist and disability rights activist, taught at Jesus and Mary College, Delhi University, for about three decades, then moved to Ambedkar University Delhi, from where she retired as Professor. She is the author of (Dis)embodied Form: Issues of Disabled Women (2003), Rethinking Disability in India (2015) and a significant edited volume Disability in South Asia: Knowledge and Experiences (2018)

How much I learnt from you, Anita my friend, and how am I performing this unthinkable task of writing your obituary! I feel as if I am writing this for you to read, for you to be gently critical about, because for sure I would have missed a nuance or two while writing about the points at which gender and disability intersect, for you cannot be written about without reference to your thinking and your scholarship. About three decades ago you sought me out to have a conversation on disability, and that destablizing  conversation never ever ended. You blew open my theoretical horizons by introducing me to the field of Disability Studies, to the idea of decentering disability from a medical to a social model, to the idea that we are not divided between abled and disabled bodies, but that we all occupy a continuum of being Temporarily Abled Bodies. A sudden fracture, an illness, and within a split second you move from abled to disabled body. You wear spectacles, your hearing is mildly impaired, you have that problem in bending your wrist because of a childhood fall – each one of us is on that continuum. Continue reading Salaam Anita! 1958 – 2024