13 Questions for December 13

It is shortly going to be five years to December 13, 2001 when the Indian parliament in New Delhi was attacked by a group of men who entered the precincts of the Parliament in an Ambassador Car. In the past five years, we have seen the ups and downs of a convoluted trial. The forging of evidence, the acquital of SAR Geelani (one of the accused) and in recent days a mounting sense of disquiet around the circumstances in which Mohammad Afzal Guru has been handed a death sentence.

Many questions remain unresolved. Here is a list of 13 Questions for December 13, excerpted from the introduction by Arundhati Roy to the forthcoming Penguin India publication – ‘December 13 – A Reader: The Strange Case of the Attack on the Indian Parliament’.

The book is an anthology of essays and texts on December 13 by – A G Noorani, Arundhati Roy, Ashok Mitra, Indira Jaising, Jawed Naqvi, Mihir Srivastava, Nandita Haksar, Nirmalangshu Mukherji, Praful Bidwai, Shuddhabrata Sengupta, Sonia Jabbar, Syed Bismillah Geelani and Tripta Wahi

13 Questions for December 13 (by Arundhati Roy – from the Introduction to ’13 December – A Reader’, Penguin India, New Delhi, December 2006)

Question 1: For months before the Attack on Parliament, both the government and the police had been saying that Parliament could be attacked. On 12 December 2001, at an informal meeting the Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee warned of an imminent attack on Parliament. On 13 December Parliament was attacked. Given that there was an ‘improved security drill’, how did a car bomb packed with explosives enter the parliament complex?

Question 2: Within days of the Attack, the Special Cell of Delhi Police said it was a meticulously planned joint operation of Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Toiba. They said the attack was led by a man called ‘Mohammad’ who was also involved in the hijacking of IC-814 in 1998. (This was later refuted by the CBI.) None of this was ever proved in court. What evidence did the Special Cell have for its claim?

Question 3: The entire attack was recorded live on Close Circuit TV (CCTV). Congress Party MP Kapil Sibal demanded in Parliament that the CCTV recording be shown to the members. He was supported by the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Najma Heptullah, who said that there was confusion about the details of the event. The chief whip of the Congress Party, Priyaranjan Dasmunshi, said, ‘I counted six men getting out of the car. But only five were killed. The close circuit TV camera recording clearly showed the six men.’ If Dasmunshi was right, why did
the police say that there were only five people in the car? Who was the the sixth person? Where is he now? Why was the CCTV recording not produced by the prosecution as evidence in the trial? Why was it not released for public viewing?

Question 4: Why was Parliament adjourned after some of these questions were raised?

Question 5: A few days after 13 December, the government declared that it had ‘incontrovertible evidence’ of Pakistan’s involvement in the attack, and announced a massive mobilization of almost half a million soldiers to the Indo-Pakistan border. The subcontinent was pushed to the brink of nuclear war. Apart from Afzal’s ‘confession’, extracted under torture (and later set aside by the Supreme Court), what was the ‘incontrovertible evidence’?

Question 6: Is it true that the military mobilization to the Pakistan border had begun long before the 13 December Attack?

Question 7: How much did this military standoff, which lasted for nearly a year, cost? How many soldiers died in the process? How many soldiers and civilians died because of mishandled landmines, and how many peasants lost their homes and land because trucks and tanks were rolling through their villages, and landmines were being planted in their fields?

Question 8: In a criminal investigation it is vital for the police to show how the evidence gathered at the scene of the attack led them to the accused. How did the police reach Mohammad Afzal? The Special Cell says S.A.R. Geelani led them to Afzal. But the message to look out for Afzal was actually flashed to the Srinagar Police before Geelani was arrested. So how did the Special Cell connect Afzal to the 13 December Attack?

Question 9: The courts acknowledge that Afzal was a surrendered militant who was in regular contact with the security forces, particularly the Special Task Force (STF) of Jammu & Kashmir Police. How do the security forces explain the fact that a person under their surveillance was able to conspire in a major militant operation?

Question 10: Is it plausible that organizations like Lashkar-e-Toiba or Jaish-e-Mohammed would rely on a person who had been in and out of STF torture chambers, and was under constant police surveillance, as the principal link for a major operation?

Question 11: In his statement before the court, Afzal says that he was introduced to ‘Mohammed’ and instructed to take him to Delhi by a man called Tariq, who was working with the STF. Tariq was named in the police charge sheet. Who is Tariq and where is he now?

Question 12: On 19 December 2001, six days after the Parliament Attack, Police Commissioner, Thane (Maharashtra), S.M. Shangari identified one of the attackers killed in the Parliament Attack as Mohammad Yasin Fateh Mohammed (alias Abu Hamza) of the Lashkar-e-Toiba, who had been arrested in Mumbai in November 2000, and immediately handed over to the J&K Police. He gave detailed descriptions to support his statement. If Police Commissioner Shangari was right, how did Mohammad Yasin, a man in the custody of the J&K Police, end up participating in the Parliament Attack? If he was wrong, where is Mohammad Yasin now?

Question 13: Why is it that we still don’t know who the five dead ‘terrorists’ killed in the Parliament Attack are?

6 thoughts on “13 Questions for December 13”

  1. Hyderabad Mp Asaduddin Owaisi right with Hezbollah South Commander Hasan Hubullah in an Undisclosed Secret Location.

    hyderabad lok sabha mp asaduddin owaisi is the first indian diplomat to visit lebanon after the war according to the etemaad urdu daily and almanar tv mr asaduddin is on a private visit to lebanon and syria and not representing the indiangovernment over there it is said to be a goodwill visit and to show support of indian muslims in the wake of death and massive destruction over there according to the reports mr owaisi flew from delhi to damascuas capital of syria and was welcomed on his arrival there by indian embassy staff and while his stay in damasacus for 3 days he visited historic and islamic holy shrines and even visited the grand ummayd mosque and after that he went to beirut by road and while his stay he along with hezbollah mps visited the southeren part of beirut city which was the most bombed area in beirut which was repetadely stuck by israeli warplanes and from there he along with various other social and aid actvists he went to qana and visited the place where a building was collapsed after a israeli airstrike in which 57 civillanns were killed and mr owaisi has even visited the port city of tyre an met its mayor mr ali musharraf .the city which was deserted at the time of war and bint jebil an area in southern lebanon which was the main battlefront between hezbollah fighters and israeli army and is said that the whole villages in that area have been devasted by the fighting which lasted for 34 days and on his visit to beirut the hyderabad mp gave an exclusive interview to the hezbollah run tv al manar and said that he has come to lebanon to show his soladirty with the lebanese people and said how th indian govt has condemned the war in lebanon and the govt of india has announced humanitarian aid worth 10 million dollars to the lebanese people he met with many civillans and old age women whose sons were killed while fighting the israeli army mr owaisi will stay in lebanon and meet lebabnese mps and even will visit indian embassy in beirut and meet indian embassy staff and ambassador . reports suggest that he even met hezbollah leaders while his stay in beirut.he met hezbollah southern commander hasan hubullah and hezbollah chairman for economic and resarch development dr ali fayyad and while coming out of lebanese parliament after meeting lebanese parliament speaker nabil berri the hyderabad mp speaking to reporters said that peace cannot be achieved in the region unless israel withdraws from all occupied lands he critcized the israeli aggression and said what israel has done by killing innocent civillans and damaging lebanons infrastructure is a act of state terrorism. and this will not destroy the will of the lebanese people fighting against occupation of there land .he said the west which preaches democracy in the region is itself against the democratically elected govt of hamas in palestine and he said it is not only lebanon which has been affected by terrorism india is also a victim of terrorism.

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s