Army wanted Abdullah, who’s surprised?

Ashish Sinha in Mail Today:

Any political decision on Kashmir — especially when the ball is in the Congress’s court — cannot afford to ignore the sentiments of lakhs of troops stationed here because, at least for now, they appear to be a more permanent fixture than any party, even the National Conference (NC). [Full text]

I told you so…

And Siddharth Varadarajan asks the right question:

But if these motives propelled the ISI to either mount or at best turn a blind eye to the Mumbai plot, why did the same agency — which essentially manages Rawalpindi’s links with militant groups active in Jammu and Kashmir — not seek to disrupt the assembly elections? [Here]

One thought on “Army wanted Abdullah, who’s surprised?”

  1. Sidharth Varadarajan’s comments are a logical explanation of lack of millitant violence during Kashmir elections.It means we should increase our contacts with Pakistan and not cut off everything.

    Like

Leave a reply to Charakan Cancel reply