Chhota Bheem – Anachronisms, Prejudice & Xenophobia: Sivakumar Radhakrishnan

Guest Post by SIVAKUMAR RADHAKRISHNAN

download (1)

The Chhota Bheem television series, highly popular among the nation’s children and also among many adults, is telecast daily in many Indian languages. The program is a long running show of many years and has its viewership in millions. Its popularity is evident from the fact that other children’s programs and advertisements are churned out from it.

The series evokes interest mainly by its plot, which is almost similar for every episode.  Also the plot is a simple one, where a cute city-state is ruled by a king, with his daughter, a princess of tender years. The king resides in a citadel atop a pretty hill.  The citizens are generally good natured.  A group of kids is shown playing in the countryside, of which the most smart and attractive is Chhota Bheem. He is assisted by a few other kids and a little talking monkey. Suddenly, evil people with sinister designs will start disturbing the peaceful city state of Dholakpur. The king will be found helpless in dealing them. At the right juncture, will enter the little Chhota Bheem and with his might, he will clear the evil elements from Dholakpur. Thus, Chhota Bheem saves the kingdom and the king at the right time. The citizens will celebrate him and continue to be happy thereafter. What could possibly be wrong with such a simple, evil-defeating, goodness-forging narrative?

A peculiar feature that can be noted by anyone within few minutes into the series is that every Chhota Bheem episode seamlessly stitches a medieval rural setting with modern scientific achievements. The problem with such a setting is that the world at large has reaped the advantages of scientific advances by going through various phases in which the outdated medieval ethos is discarded for new and rational thinking. But here we have a setting of a medieval kingdom that uses the equipment of modernity (like travelling to Mars in a rocket), and thus the show gives an impression of scientific advancement without any change in the old ways of living, such as feudal kingdoms and so on. This anachronism collapses the scientific narrative of progress through stages, and ridiculously juxtaposes “power packed ladoos” with space age rockets.

Further, the stereotypes and prejudices that the series perpetuates are very distasteful. Chhota Bheem’s sidekick is a fat boy, who is foolish, who continually receives a battering and whose complexion is shown as darker than the others’, is named Kalia, meaning Blackie in Hindi. The problem is not just naming a character by his skin tone, but when the character is associated with cowardice and made an object of ridicule, the dark skin tone is indirectly associated with such traits.

Similarly, the evil elements that disturb the tranquility of Dholakpur always happen to be foreigners. The magicians, showmen and other tricksters who try to usurp and corrupt the kingdom are always shown to be coming from outside. Their accent, attire, talents are shown in a peculiarly strange way. Every time a foreigner visits Dholakpur on the pretext of entertaining and helping the citizens, they always have a hidden agenda. As the country supposedly progresses with transnational transactions, such mean depictions of ‘the foreign’ as evil, is certainly backward and a clear example of stereotyping. Such typecasting of foreigners will induce hatred among the little children who watch the programme.

Moreover, in the current political climate, in which the ‘foreigner’ is often portrayed as the minority communities, who need to continuously prove their non-foreignness and nationalism again and again, this kind of xenophobia is pointed and dangerous.

This generation does not need scientific anachronism, racism and xenophobia, but a message of universal friendship and progress based on cooperation. Chhota Bheem would do well to rethink the messages it is sending out.

Sivakumar Radhakrishnan is an Assistant Professor at The New College, Chennai.

E-mail:teachnew@outlook.com. Blog: teachnew.wordpress.com

6 thoughts on “Chhota Bheem – Anachronisms, Prejudice & Xenophobia: Sivakumar Radhakrishnan

  1. It is possible that children don’t see things in this manner. I remember being aghast when my 12 y/o son told me about how women (prostitutes) were treated in GTA. Catch by the hair and swing them, bang them on the road, kick them in the face.

    How can kids see this?? He turned on me, ‘You think children are stupid, don’t you? All the boys know they can’t do these things in real life. The girls also play the game, they don’t get angry. But parents…’ The less said about parental assumption, the better.

  2. K SHESHU BABU

    The word ‘Bheem’ itself is a mythological adaptation of Mahabharat ‘Bheem’ and it is of no surprise that the serial has overdose of surrealism with a ‘moral’ touch. The archaic morals include good white opposing bad black guy and winning handsdown. And all the good in the world — that is maintaining status quo — triumphs while the bad– whether it is questioning the existing order or scientific thought ot logic or rebellious attitude– looses heavily. The serials are indoctrinating children with traditional right-wing stuff and dangerously ‘closing’ the thought process. The present government may promote such stuff in leaps and bounds and ‘bury’ the residual thinking capacity of the present and future growing child.

  3. Shankar

    Looks Sivakumar plays the role of professor GradGrind of Hard Times by writing this article. Children like imaginations and need it more than facts of whether this happens in medieval or modern period. Chota bheem is for kids and not for postmortem analysis like our polluted adult minds where we see problem with everything.

    My son liked it when he was a kid and now he is a teen and he is not attracted to it. Kids pass on to other things as they grow up. My daughter now watches it often now. All these years, I have seen both of them showing good characters and value by watching Chota Bheem and citing examples from the serial to understand the daily life.

    1. Sreejith

      Dear Shankar, regardless of whether kids grow out of it, visual media, especially that which caters to kids, should be subject to such criticism. Visual media communicate to the subconscious and is capable of generating stereotypes like the ones mentioned in the article.

  4. Shilpa

    The stereotyping and prejudice in Chhota Bheem is especially bad when you compare it to other programs aimed at the same age group. Like most of the ones on Nick Jr. I think it’s success may be a case of scum rising to the top.

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s