Then They Came For ..

Tree Wants to be Calm
But Wind Will Not Stop !
-Jose Maria Sison
( Filipino Revolutionary and Poet)

Whether all the leading public intellectuals of our times have suddenly decided to go for a break – now that Kanhaiya Kumar is out of jail – or are thinking that the impending storm would peter away on its own. Anyone who has closely followed the public hounding of two of the finest human beings of our times – Prof Nivedita Menon and Gauhar Raza – and the silence which has followed with it ( barring a statement signed by many and few articles here and there on some webmagazines ) would understand what does that mean. While Prof Menon is being targetted because of airing of selective quotes from one of her lectures, Gauhar has been put under the scanner because of his participation in Indo-Pak mushaira. It is clear that one of his poems – focussing on the dangerous cocktail of religion and politics – which he recited there, has infuriated them.

Here also the same TV channel is in focus which neither has any qualms in exhibiting its proximity with the ruling establishment nor has ever faced any moral dilemma in presenting doctored videos in painting JNU as a den of ‘anti-nationals’.

It is a dreary scenario but as things are unfolding before us, in this neoliberal times, all talk of media being a watchdog of democracy have started appearing unbelievable. ( Let me emphasise that there are few noble exceptions also.) Perhaps we seem to be entering a period where the boundaries between media and the ruling elite have suddenly started appearing fuzzy or seem to be crumbling to say the least.

Neither Prof Menon nor Gauhar Raza need any introduction but looking at the fact that a conscious attempt is on to pigeonhole them in a particular way and deny their work as writers, scholars, activists, documentary makers it is important to state a few things.

Leading academic and activist Prof Menon, teaches Political Thought at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi and her major publications include ‘Seeing Like a Feminist’, ‘Power and Contestation: India since 1989 (co-authored with Aditya Nigam),’ ‘Recovering Subversion: Feminist Politics Beyond The Law (2004)’, ‘Gender and Politics in India,’ (ed.). She has been an active commentator on the blog kafila.org, and has been active with citizen’s forums in Delhi around secularism, worker’s and women’s rights, sexuality and in opposition to the nuclear bomb. Scientist by profession and a Urdu poet by choice Gauhar is a long time social activist and documentary filmmaker. Known for his films like ‘Jung-e-Azadi’ and ‘Inqilaab’ – based on Bhagat Singh, Gauhar is working to popularize the understanding of science among general public.

As any impartial observer can see both of them ‘rightly suit’ the self-proclaimed ‘nationalist’ brigade who are ready to go to any extent to paint someone as ‘anti-national’. Prof Menon belongs to JNU whereas Gauhar is married to Shabnam Hashmi, who has been a leading voice of the anti-communal movement.

The storm troopers presume that it is rather a smart way of sanitising their own past, especially procrastination of their political forefathers before the Britishers during anti-colonial struggle, and keeping themselves aloof from the mass upsurge then. It is their rather naive understanding that by unleashing their muscle power against such ‘anti-nationals’ they can even lay claim over the moral halo of the real freedom fighters.

Commenting on this targetting, an editorial in ‘The Tribune’ titled ‘The Enemy Within’ underlines how the rightwing wants to shape discourse of the future. It says (http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/editorials/the-enemy-within/208363.html)

The RSS’ annual stock taking session has now revealed the primary reason for the serial framing of secularists. Under the guise of demanding strict action in universities against “anti-national” forces and “slogans calling for destruction of the nation”, it wishes to close down the primary channel of creative and reasoned opposition against its saffron agenda. The RSS has laid down its agenda in plain view.

The planned and mischievous manner in which Prof Menon and Gauhar have been selectively targeted – one by one – makes one thing very clear that anyone can become their target if it suits them. Anyone who still retains the capacity to think independently and is courageous enough to raise uncomfortable, incovenient questions before them in whatever capacity need be prepared to face their wrath.

We need to understand that you need not be a card holding Commie or an Islamist to attract their undue attention.

Golwalkar, the second Supremo of RSS might have included Communists, Muslims and Christians in his list of ‘internal enemies’, today when the proponents of Hindu Rashtra are having a field day, your mere refusal to toe their line in academics or your sticking to constitutional principles – may be as a government servant against their machinations to the contrary – can invite their wrath.

It was not for nothing that some time ago Ramchandra Guha has rightly said that the present dispensation is the most ‘anti-intellectual government’ in post independence times. And leading historian Sanjay Subramanyam in an interview with Sagarika Ghose had commented on the worrying public discourse where.

”.. Real people have the right to say nothing, anonymous people have a right to say everything. So we are becoming a society of cowards. It’s a terrifying idea.”..(http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/all-that-matters/Real-people-are-censored-the-anonymous-say-what-they-want-Sanjay-Subrahmanyam/articleshow/50224623.cms)

Famous Hindi Poet Rajesh Joshi, in one of his memorable poems written in early 90 s, when preparations for demolition of Babri Mosque were on, had rightly said :

Jo Is Pagalpan Me Shamil Nahin Honge, Mare Jayenge
(Those who are not ready to join the frenzy, Beware of Death)

Nobody had expected that the poem would look still relevant a quarter of century afterwards also.

3 thoughts on “Then They Came For ..

  1. Well said, Subhash, I was wondering about the same thing. After Menon published her rejoinder, not a peep out of our so-called intellectuals. Did it probably shut them up, render them speechless? Or are they just fence-sitting cowards.
    You might notice that enough has been said defending Paranjape’s speech and there has been strident criticism about the questions the students asked in the Q&A session that followed the lecture. Suddenly they find Kanhaiya questioning the professor crass. Suddenly they have to point out that it is not the Left-Right binary, but that Paranjape was nuanced. I don’t understand that at all. If someone is neutral, then somebody with an ideology must not speak at all? They were all over the place trying to paint a picture of intolerance in the very students who wanted tolerance. If you notice, there was not one rebuttal from any of the intellectuals. Now they are silent about Menon and Raza… shame on this sort of intellectualism., Thank you for saying this aloud… I appreciate it, Subhash…

    1. shaturya

      I am always concerned about a lawful society…uniform law and equally applicable one..not selectively applicable depending upon….’ism ‘doesn’t interest me..unfortunately , after 1969, the tendency to selectively interpret the law picked up ..then it acquired selective implementation..particularly from 1990s…This selective applicability of law is such a dangerous tool in the hands of the government that they can commit anything while appearing to be respecting law….unfortunately we don’t raise our voice against this selective application of law ..this( raising of voice ) will help in strengthening democratic forces in an effective manner ….

  2. V Subramoniam

    Very important article. The issue is so serious that we don’t have all the resources needed to fight this well. But understanding the way the media has been working against the people by entrapping them and understanding state instruments using the media to crush opponents etc are really important. We need to have a good theoretical and technical and legal understanding of this process to fight back.
    Request all to start at least with 3 articles and educate common people. Chomsky is not up to date with this kind of mediatisation of politics. Ravi Sundaram’s is well known and prophetic.

    http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/683300

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2622854

    http://www.mediatization.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/conferences_calls/Mediatization_abstract_booklet.pdf

We look forward to your comments. Comments are subject to moderation as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s