Category Archives: Democracy

Cockroach Janta Party – a turning point for a dying democracy?

At Jantar Mantar

As I was leaving the protest site of the Cockroach Janta Party at Jantar Mantar where I had gone to express solidarity – on July 5th, the sixteenth day of the struggle – a young man who had also just stepped out, approached me to ask the way to the nearest Metro station. I was not sure myself, so I suggested he feed it into the map on his phone, which he was holding. He laughed and said “hum gaanv se hain, lagta hai ki kisi se poochna hi achha hai.” (I’m from the village, I always feel it’s better to ask someone)

I replied “main toh ek alag hi peedhi se hoon, mujhe bhi kisi se poochna behtar lagta hai” (I am from a different generation altogether, I too prefer to ask someone).

United in our spatio-temporal dislocation, we then got directions from some other passerby, and walked together for a bit till I reached my car.  Was he a student, I asked.  He turned out to be from Ayodhya, running a small business in Faridabad. He had decided to come to Jantar Mantar and meet the “bacche” (although he was not much more than a baccha himself) because he wanted to be there to show support for their struggle. He couldn’t study much himself, and although he was happy running his small business, he said kabhi kabhi lagta hai ki zyaada padh paata toh business hi aur achhi tareeke se kar paata.  Mujhe padhna achha lagta tha…” (Sometimes I feel if I could have studied a bit more I could have even run my business better. I used to enjoy studying).

He had come all the way from Faridabad, when he could spare some time on a Sunday, to meet these other young people who had  captured his imagination with their guts and determination. As for this easy, fleeting camaraderie between two strangers of different generations and genders and class locations in a city like Delhi – what was it? Where did it come from? It was not entirely unfamiliar. It was the kind of connection sparked by the magic of collective struggle against injustice – it is a sense of safety, and inexplicable familiarity, of home and hope. We all felt this magic in the encampments against the CAA – at Shaheen Bagh, Khajoori and many other sites, and in other cities and towns.

And you feel it at Jantar Mantar where The Cockroach Janta Party is starting its twentieth day of protest today, demanding the resignation of the Education Minister for the large scale collapse of the entrance exam system nation-wide. Sonam Wangchuk has now been on hunger strike for the twelfth day today, as have some 18 to 20 students from different student organisations (mostly from AISA), from different universities in Delhi, and from different states. They have come from Tamil Nadu, and Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, and they are on the hunger strike too. Some of the students have had to be hospitalized since the the tenth day or so, but others have since joined in.  The young hunger strikers look wan and pinched,  but beam broadly, their faces glowing with purpose. They make jokes, they make you laugh, and they fill your heart with hope and pride.

Hundreds of others are milling about, and some of them are parents. One young woman whose child was only in middle school had been there every day, she told me. “They are fighting for the future of our children, no?”

It is now the stuff of legend – how a relatively unknown young man, Abhijeet Dipke, in a moment of anger at the massive corruption in the entrance exam system, set up a funny meme satirically taking on proudly the insulting name given to young people who question the government, by the Chief Justice of India. Because Dipke called it a “party” to mirror the acronym of the BJP, it sparked enormous excitement among the younger generation, the responses online were overwhelming, he decided to come back from the USA to protest at Jantar Mantar, and called on all young people to join him there.

An older Left oriented generation watched in some bewilderment and suspicion (there was the usual cynicism about AAP, with which Dipke had been associated; suspicion about Wangchuk –  why was he released from prison so quickly, is this the BJP’s B team?).  But the protest took off on the ground with thousands of students and young people on the first few days; the CJP was joined from the first day by the ecological warrior from Ladakh, Sonam Wangchuk, and by Left student organisations. Soon, leaders of the CPI(M), CPI (ML) and Trinamool and of the farmers’ movement, were seen at Jantar Mantar publicly expressing solidarity, as were many other individuals and organizations known by their political activism and their writing, to be opposed to the Hindutva corporate regime. This regime has now acquired the kind of suffocating, monopolistic, systemic power unimaginable in the democracy that was India; power directed in the last instance by the shadowy, wealthy, Brahminical organization with no accountability whatsoever to any authority or to the people of India – the RSS.

The issue – education

The financial corruption at every level in the BJP-RSS ecosystem (manifest even in the Ram Temple), has been suspected in the education sector very clearly for over a decade. Substantial rumours abound of faculty appointments in public universities through cash payments (it is not sufficient to be an actual RSS activist – that is only the minimum requirement). Selection of security agencies is also said to involve money changing hands (and the budget allocation for security is now triple what is spent on libraries in public universities.) I speak of rumours, because there has not been the kind of full exposure  that we see with the Ram Temple, but the blatant daylight robbery at the temple suggest that the stories circulating about lesser institutions (mere universities as opposed to the house of god) must be true.

A young school student Sarthak Sidhant was able to track online, the ways in which CBSE modified its criteria for tenders to favour a blacklisted edutech company that handled the On Screen Marking System, which turned out to be a complete disaster. The role of edutech companies by the way, is explicitly fostered by the NEP to set exams, conduct evaluations, and run online courses. These are private, profit making organizations, which are now to take on many of the key functions of publicly funded universities.

If the venerable CBSE has shown itself to be rotten to the core, there is no doubt that the opaque National Testing Agency (NTA) – set up  in 2017 as a centralized institution to replace all other forms of evaluation that educational boards and institutions have set up over time – is completely compromised too. It is not a government institution (unlike UGC and CBSE) but a “registered society”, an autonomous body under the Ministry of Education. Teachers and teachers’ associations have predicted from the very moment of the setting up of NTA , and the rolling out of the National Education Policy in 2020 (NEP 2020), the very outcomes we see today.

The JNU Teachers’ Association issued a statement in June 2026, analysing the rot since the NTA was set up and NEP rolled out. Titled “Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here”, it concluded by demanding that

the NEP 2020 must be immediately rolled back to protect the future of India’s students, the NTA must be immediately scrapped to save the autonomy of public universities and the Union Minister of Education, Mr Dharmendra Pradhan must immediately resign to save the integrity of education system in India.

The NTA since its inception has an unbroken record of exam leaks, manipulations and cancellations. There have been more than 40 paper leaks in the last five years, an unprecedented number. Each leak has put money in pockets, and each leak has resulted in suicides of young students.

Those of us who have participated in exam paper setting at NTA have often remarked that despite the flourishes of security protocols (searches, passwords, leaving phones outside etc), how easy it would be for NTA employees to gain control of the papers. Initially many of us boycotted the process as we wanted to continue with the entrance exam the way JNU faculty have conducted it since 1970. All India exam centres, exams to be written in any of the official Indian languages, not a single leak in all these decades. Essay type questions where candidates were assessed not for “flowery English” as a NITI Ayog member said, (defending Multiple Choice Questions as testing intelligence, not “mugging”), but for showing interest in the discipline and expressing whatever their views were on an issue, in their own ways. Eventually we ended the boycott because we didn’t want to push ourselves out of the entrance exam process. And discovered that the process of MCQ paper setting has its own logic.

MCQs require multiple sets of question papers of 100s of questions to be set supposedly to ensure that nobody knows which paper will actually be used, but what this means is that even a sincere paper setter trying to test thought rather than information, runs out of creative questions, and is reduced to setting questions that are simply about dates and places. However, since the NTA also compensated us for our time with substantial fees for paper setting (which was part of our normal duties when we did it at the university), not every paper setter, to put it mildly, has been sincere. (Many of these were the eager new faculty appointments whose trajectory we mentioned earlier). So MCQs at their best, as seen in the CUET, are precisely about mugging. And evidently, the NTA exam setters now resort directly to getting AI to do the job,  as happened with the UGC NET Sociology paper. Remember, these paper setters are faculty from universities, who are paid an extra fee over and above their salaries to do this work.

(This morning we learn in addition that this paper was leaked. The leaked pdf document matches the internal template used at NTA for preparing question banks.)

The rampant impunity at every level has now reached levels of absurdity.

Teachers argued that the NEP was a blueprint for saffronized and corporatized education. Its plan to merge schools with lower numbers of students was intended to shut down schools. And indeed this policy of “rationalization” led to the shutting down of 93,000 schools all over India in the decade 2014 to 2025.

There has been drastic transformation of curricula across universities partly driven by the kind of semi literate common sense that governs India today, and partly by design, intended to end any critical thinking whatsoever.

For teachers’ critiques of

NTA see  The National Testing Agency is a scam – shut it down now! Ayesha Kidwai

NEP, see  NEP 2020 – elitist and corporatized education under Hindu Rashtra: Nivedita Menon

MCQs see Does the MCQ Format Work For Social Sciences and Humanities Entrance Examinations? Ayesha Kidwai and Nivedita Menon

In short, this regime wants to end access to publicly funded education, to end critical thinking, and to produce our young people as a cheap labour pool for the rapacious global economy. The NEP says proudly that we will train young people to hold three or four jobs in a lifetime – an education policy that celebrates precarity!

Back to Jantar Mantar

There is a crack, a crack in everything -, that’s how the light gets in…

Leonard Cohen’s words come to mind. What we see at Jantar Mantar is a crack in the darkness that has descended on us, ever more heavily, over the past decade.

The Cockroach Janta Party has tapped into the anger and resentment and despair of young people over exam leaks, but that’s not all this is. The young people we see at Jantar Mantar and all over the country (NSUI has apparently independently of CJP, been conducting militant demonstrations in many cities), are using the leaks to speak about democracy and secularism and social justice.  Jai Bhim and Inquilab Zindabad and Hindu Muslim ki Rajneeti Nahin Chalegi. And Meri Life Meri Marzi, slogans about sexuality but also Bharat Mata ki Jai – all of these ring out at the protests.

These young people have grown up in this regime, they have come to adulthood in a dispensation that normalises hate and dispossession of the poor and powerless, and yet they are not normalised, not disciplined into this regime. The universities have been the centre of protests over issues ranging from fee hikes, to sexual violence, library facilities, reconstructions of syllabi along Hindutva lines, ecological questions to do with the campus and beyond. No wonder the NEP is structured to end all of this unrest forever.

The CJP is by no means a homogeneous platform, it is a coalition that has come together over one issue – education. There are internal differences on other issues, but those need not be raised here, at this time, and they are not. This is the form of successful non-party mobilisation we saw in the late 1990s to early 21st century – citizens coming together over Hindu right-wing violence or workers’ rights, or in  opposition to nuclear energy and the nuclear bomb – broad platforms of individuals and organizations that did not agree on everything, but worked on that one issue and marched together for a while.

As a young student activist Puranjai wrote earlier, when the CJP was conducting protests but the Jantar Mantar sit-in had not yet begun:

If one is able to imagine the protest site as something other than that of a unilinear flow of information, if one is able to design a setup other than the stage and the road, one might be able to move towards more just alternatives. By rallying around the cause of a more inclusive India, one can build solidarities that might not have been possible before. This present moment holds promise and one need not sit away from it.

Everything is not joyous and celebratory and militant all the time at Jantar Mantar.  A parent, a sibling of one of the students on hunger strike arrived the day I was there, they try to keep up a brave front. There is an overlying sadness about the students who committed suicide.  Since the mainstream media studiously avoids any reference to this extraordinary protest, most of our information is from social media. We see some of the grief stricken parents arrive, they meet Abhijeet, they cry.  We see Abhijeet’s eyes fill with tears, he struggles to control himself. We cannot forget how young they are, these heroes of our democracy, who remind us what it is to be principled,  determined and undaunted – but also vulnerable and human.

A local dog has joined the protest, he feels at home in that community. I am reminded of the massive anti fee hike student marches of 2019, about which I have earlier written.  In one of these, starting from JNU, a dog from Ganga Dhaba had decided to accompany her friends, passing through barricades, running along with them, she marched with them all the way to Jor Bagh. It was a carnival we found there, when some faculty arrived to express solidarity, Music and singing and energizing chants. Suddenly the street lights were switched off, and everyone knew in that moment of darkness that the lathi charge was about to begin. The two students I was chatting with, moved of one accord. They dashed off to find the dog, and as I stepped to the side, my heart pounding at the knowledge of what was to come, protected from it by my age and status as faculty (though the lathis did fall on two of our male colleagues), I saw the two women emerge from the crowd, carrying their friend, running, stumbling, the dog safely in their arms.

They carried her back to campus.

Our young people know and practice the truth of vasudhaiva kutumbakam, the slogan made meaningless by RSS functionaries, including the Prime Minister and Home Minister.

On the day I was at Jantar Mantar, I met Sonam Wangchuk too, briefly. He was reading something, and looked up courteously as I introduced myself as a teacher. It was the 8th day of his fast, he was clear-eyed and smiling. What do you teach, he asked me.

Political Theory, I said.

He raised his fist and smiled teasingly – ” We are doing the practice”.

Every single force in our country that resists corporatized Hindu Rashtra needs to see this moment as one that breaks the hopeless pall of doom that we have been experiencing. As the BJP breaks up party after party to gain the majority in parliament that the people did not give it in 2024; as the ongoing SIR disenfranchises large numbers of Indians; as election after election is managed for the BJP by the ECI; and the courts fail us time after time, falling in line with the government – militant and peaceful civil disobedience might be the only weapon against a regime that has swallowed every institution, ending up more powerful, more vicious and unethical, than the colonial government ever was.

The CJP at this time has one single powerful demand – the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The arrogance and lack of accountability of this regime is such that Pradhan dismissed the CJP protest as “a B Team of disruptive elements”.

Can these audacious young people take back India for us?

Not by themselves perhaps, but what if every single oppositional force is part of the push? And as more and more sections join in,  perhaps another demand can be added – the dissolution of the current Election Commission of India; the repeal of amendments that gave the government complete control over appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, and immunity to election commissioners from legal proceedings for decisions made in their official capacity;  in short, the restoration of the previous autonomous  – and accountable – status of the ECI.

Can a larger mass campaign endorse the CJP’s demand for the resignation of the Education Minister but also go beyond, to the fundamental issue of elections managed by the ECI for the current regime?

Lessons from the Recent Conflicts in West Asia -Talmiz Ahmad

Democracy Dialogues Series 44

Organised by New Socialist Initiative

Theme : Lessons from the Recent Conflicts in West Asia

Speaker : Talmiz Ahmad Author, Columnist, Ex Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Ex – Director General of the Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA)
Date and Time :

6 PM ( IST), Sunday, 19 th July 2026

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87175249495?pwd=ockovgad75fm9x7aVAKbJvPwvyhy8a.1

Meeting chat link
https://us02web.zoom.us/launch/jc/87175249495

Meeting ID: 871 7524 9495
Passcode: 227740

Abstract :

 After a quick overview of the recent wars in West Asia, I will look at some “lessons” that these conflicts have for us. These will include:

* the enduring importance of the Palestinian issue as a vestige of the age of imperialism
* Has the holocaust given Israel impunity from  all crime?
* Nature of future conflict: precision targeting in which energy,     food and technology “corridors” will be the principal battlegrounds
* Armed confrontations between the colonial and colonised states: lessons from asymmetric conflict
* The reality and limitations of US power
* The outlook for “World Order”
* Are we looking at an emerging “clash of civilisations”?
* Recurring patterns in West Asian history
* In this global turbulence, where does India fit in?

About the Speaker :

Talmiz Ahmad joined the Indian Foreign Service in 1974. Early in his career, he was posted in a number of West Asian countries such as Kuwait, Iraq and Yemen and later, between 1987-90, he was Consul General in Jeddah. He also held positions in the Indian missions in New York, London and Pretoria. He was the head of the Gulf and Hajj Division in the Ministry of External Affairs in 1998-2000.

He served as Indian Ambassador to Saudi Arabia twice (2000-03; 2010-11); Oman (2003-04), and the UAE (2007-10). He was also Additional Secretary for International Cooperation in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in 2004-06, and Director General of the Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA), New Delhi, in 2006-07. In July 2011, the Saudi Government conferred on him the King Abdul Aziz Medal First Class for his contribution to the promotion of Indo – Saudi relations.

After retirement from foreign service in 2011, he worked in the corporate sector in Dubai for four years. He is now a full-time academic and holds the Ram Sathe Chair in International Studies, Symbiosis International University, Pune.

He has published four books: 

Reform in the Arab World: External Influences and Regional Debates (2005); 

Children of Abraham at War: The Clash of Messianic Militarisms (2010), 

The Islamist Challenge in West Asia: Doctrinal and Political Competitions after the Arab Spring (2013). 

West Asia at War: Repression, Resistance and Great Power Games, ( April 2022, Harper Collins )

He writes regularly in the Indian and West Asian media and lectures on the politics and economics of West Asia, Eurasia and the Indian Ocean, political Islam and energy security.

CJP and us – The Mirror to the “Nation”: Puranjai

Guest Post by PURANJAI

Image of June 6th protest in Delhi courtesy The Hindustan Gazette

The social media phenomenon Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has been doing a series of protests now, its demand being the resignation of the education minister Dharmendra Pradhan. A lot of people have been writing on it, focusing on an analysis of its various features as well as the response of the state. It has opened interesting points for discussion. However, for this present space, I would be restricting myself to an analysis of the mirror it has held up to our society.

It is no secret, now that we are surviving Prime Minister Modi’s  third term that the government which quells any protest before it even really begins, gave a very tolerant treatment to the CJP organisers of as well as the protesters. While many have written their own explanations about it, I believe, considering the already initiated vilification and censorship campaign against Abhijit Dipke and the stationing of vast number of police forces at Jantar Mantar and Sansad Marg (I was there on 6 June) that the reason for such a tolerant treatment lies in numbers and content. The government could be said to be testing the translation of online resentment into physical spaces which would be a more precise gauge of the phenomenon. Without allowing the permission to even protest, it would have sent a very visible message of authoritarian tendencies.

The government couldn’t have risked denying the permission since it was being widely covered by the non-mainstream media and the middle-class was talking about it. This is in my opinion a very important aspect to note about it. The middle-class which has the necessary social capital to create narratives is very important to a government. It is this class which receives the media and political attention in moments of crisis. It is this class which is able to hegemonise empathy in a direction it sees desirable. Moreover, it does all of this without actively organising and politicising to a certain end.

This middle-class stays silent when bulldozers demolish homes of poor and the socially marginalised. Even when lakhs of names are removed from the electoral roll and subsequent attempts are being daily made to snatch citizenship of fellow human beings, it stays silent or gives active support to such actions. It stays largely regressive on the question of social justice and has a worldview of caring only for raising one’s own income levels. This section which should otherwise act as the one aggressively moving the country forward in all democratic aspects fails to do its duty to the country. It is this class residing in the strategic location of the capital and surrounding areas that the BJP could not afford to antagonise. Once it turns up in large numbers (much to the dismay of the dispensation), it chose to tolerate and perhaps might even accept the very minimum and technocratic demands in the future.

This section which is largely composed of socially privileged Hindus easily stakes claim to the ‘Nation’. The chanting of “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, “Vande Mataram”, the cricket team’s blue jersey, the A.R. Rehman version of Vande Mataram, the tricolour and above all the stress on the tool of peaceful protest; these all are symbols not created by the BJP even as it utilises these quite effectively. Today these are seen as visible symbols of nationalism (for most of which several people have been killed as well) and interestingly, their history predates the BJP’s history itself. Most of these symbols and mental frameworks are drawn from the Congress-dominated freedom struggle. It arose from a socially privileged  (and in some cases anti-Muslim) Hindu section of the population, came to occupy a hegemonic position across the country and stand in for a necessary sporting of the idea of nationalism.

This nationalism is comfortably sported by this middle-class that came to protest. Without the display of politics that challenges the establishment in some way and props up an alternative, the BJP finds it difficult to reply to this. For there are no Muslims as the face of CJP to be labelled as from Pakistan. Nor are there seemingly any “Khalistanis” to slander and arrest. Nor are there any structure-shaking demands being made by this middle-class and its CJP leadership. Till now, all the characterisations (of “exam-reform”) and the one single demand are all within the acceptable fold of nationalism that BJP is comfortable with. Yes, Ambedkar and Bhagat Singh are present in symbolic forms at the site as well, but without their radical challenge to the status-quo. It would be important to recall that the RSS-BJP has conveniently appropriated these symbols while invisibilising their message.

All of this, tells something about us constituting the middle-class. More than what it tells about the protest or the government, I believe this phenomenon displays an interesting aspect about us. Broken by caste, stunted by patriarchy and alienated by capitalism, we are not able to form an organic solidarity with the people of our country. While the social fabric of our country gets torn with every passing day, while class divide continues to dehumanise us every moment, we comfortably turn our eyes away (or perhaps some of us revel seeing these injustices continue). That we only gather together and wear the abstract concept of nationalism on our sleeves when our own economic interests are in peril is not a thing to be proud of.

Consider the revolutionary slogan of “Inquilab Zindabad” which I saw the people comfortably shouting at the site. But what is the content of this inquilab? Does it include the response to privatisation and centralisation of education, of the various caste and gender discriminations that happen in our educational spaces or even before one reaches (or not reaches) these spaces? Does it design a future for the adivasis and the Muslims? Do all of these figure in our idea of an alternative India?

Everyday, we see people getting lynched, kidnapped, tortured, maimed, discriminated against, silenced, assaulted, raped. No abstract concept of the nation is made available to these people within which they could wrap their concrete realities and thus show to the society for recognition and acknowledgement. It is really interesting to note that the tricolour and “Saare Jahan se accha Hindustan humara” did not save the protesters at Shaheen Bagh. For them was reserved the jail, the lathi, the bullet and the ultimate tag of “anti-national”. When the socially-privileged Hindus use it though, it is a different matter.

My pessimism only stretches till that of the intellect and I believe that however the past has been or the current limitations of the movement, one can transcend it if one desires. It has been long that the idea of India has been hegemonised by a select few. The far-right in India banks on it and creates an even unjust idea everyday through the mechanisms of the RSS. However, the present moment has provided an opportunity. As the establishment parties fail to provide any sustainable alternative to the status-quo, it has fallen on the people to design one. By being in dialogue with each other, the people of India can craft a democratic alternative. The government hates people talking to each other as fellow human beings. It would rather have us scrolling reels and liking the ridiculous Melody memes.

At a moment like this, physical mobilisations can be used to enter dialogue, rather than merely reducing the people to an audience which repeats outworn slogans. If one is able to imagine the protest site as something other than that of a unilinear flow of information, if one is able to design a setup other than the stage and the road, one might be able to move towards more just alternatives. By rallying around the cause of a more inclusive India, one can build solidarities that might not have been possible before. This present moment holds promise and one need not sit away from it. We must cautiously engage, if only to at least honestly try to enter a democratic dialogue with scope of emancipation. I maintain an optimism if not in the stage, at least in the people.

Puranjai is a PhD scholar at JNU

Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here: JNU Teachers’ Association

Teachers and their representative bodies have long been pointing out the disasters inherent in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 as well as specifically the scam of the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the central role given to EdTech companies in the NEP.  EdTech companies are to offer courses apart from testing (we have seen how well that has gone!)  thus eventually replacing universities and schools altogether.

Here we post the statement by Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association, issued last week in the context of the collapse of India’s examination system.

Links to two relevant earlier posts on Kafila:

The National Testing Agency is a scam – shut it down now! Ayesha Kidwai

NEP 2020 – elitist and corporatized education under Hindu Rashtra: Nivedita Menon

Statement by JNUTA (6th June 2026)

The JNU Teachers’ Association and the larger community engaged in teaching and learning across the country have been consistently writing and cautioning the government that the move toward over-centralization in the Indian education system was against the federal structure of India and would result in the erosion of academic integrity in the country. The current state of the education system serves as a grim validation of these warnings, proving that the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the NEP 2020 are direct attacks on the constitutional, social, and the academic fabric of our educational system. JNUTA had time and again reiterated that for a country as geographically and socially diverse as India and where education is a Concurrent List subject, increased centralization in the hands of NTA has been a recipe for disaster. Despite evidence of zero academic competence, the NTA which was established as a registered society in 2018 under the MoE, was brazenly entrusted with the future of crores of students, replacing University’s own entrance exams and those conducted by specialized bodies like the AICTE, CSIR, UGC, ICAR, and NCHM. Continue reading Over-centralization in Indian education system – the warning was ignored and the crisis is here: JNU Teachers’ Association

क्वार्टर लाइफ / देविका रेगे / सुभाष गाताडे

‘क्वार्टर लाइफ’ यानी नई सदी में पुराना भारत

कुछ रचनाएं, कुछ किताबें मन में ठहर जाती हैं। आप कह सकते हैं कि उनकी ओर बार बार लौटने का मन करता है, निश्चित ही उनकी यह ख़ासियत इस वजह से पैदा होती है कि वे आप के मन के कुछ तारों को छेड़ने में कामयाब होती हैं, आप की दुखती रग को कहीं छू देती हैं। देविका रेगे (https://devikarege.com/about) के पहले उपन्यास ‘क्वार्टरलाइफ’ Quarterlife के बारे में मैं यही कह सकता हूँ।

क्वार्टरलाइफ अर्थात चौथाई  जीवन। उम्र का वही पड़ाव जब आप को पहली बार एहसास होता है कि आप की अपनी ‘राय होने की क्या खुशी होती है’ ‘that age when you discover the pleasure of opinion’, भविष्य को लेकर चिन्ता भी होती है, पसोपश भी होते हैं, ज़िन्दगी के दूरगामी निर्णय लेने के ज़बरदस्त दबाव में होते हैं, ख़ुद पर ही संदेह, ख़ुद की खोज का यह दौर होता है। …

उपन्यास के पन्नों पर आप ‘पहचान की राजनीति से लेकर काॅरपोरेट लूट और आदर्शवाद की सीमाएं, इन सभी की छटाओं को देख सकते हैं। उपन्यास के यह सभी किरदार अपने आप में भारत के इस बदलते रूप का एक अंश लेकर चल रहे हैं। जैसे जैसे वह न्यू इंडिया से टकराते हैं, वे उस गहरे में विभाजित और जटिल वातावरण के बारे में सचेत होते जाते हैं। नतीजा होता है कि लगातार विस्तारित होती एक कहानी जो उत्सव की एक रात तक उरूज तक पहुंचती दिखती है, जब समूची बंबई सड़कों पर है और सुषुप्त असंतोष फूट पड़ता है।’ ( Read the complete text here : https://sammukh.com/subhash_gatade/)

Citizens for Democracy Writes Open Letter to CJI Protesting “Cockroach” Remarks

We are publishing below the Open Letter to the Chief Justice of India, written by Citizens for Democracy

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
New Delhi.

Esteemed Sir,

Citizens for Democracy (CFD) strongly protests your comment equating environmentalists, RTI activists and others with cockroaches and parasites

While hearing a petition filed by a lawyer seeking designation as a senior advocate, you said in the court on May 15, 2026, “There are already parasites of society who attack the system, and you want to join hands with them?… There are youngsters like cockroaches, who don’t get any employment or have any place in profession. Some of them become media, some of them become social media, RTI activists and other activists, and they start attacking everyone.”

Your comment generated heat and anger among the activists following which you tried to clarify your position the next day: “I am pained to read how a section of the media has misquoted my oral observations made during the hearing of a frivolous case yesterday. What I had specifically criticised were those who have entered professions like the Bar (legal profession) with the aid of fake and bogus degrees. Similar persons have sneaked into the media, social media, and other noble professions as well, and hence, they are like parasites. It is totally baseless to suggest that I criticised the youth of our nation. Not only am I proud of our present and future human resource, but every youth of India inspires me. It is not an exaggeration to say that Indian youth have great regard and respect for me, and I too see them as the pillars of a developed India.”

This is a lame explanation as your comment does target activists who you have presumed that if they are young, and have become activists they must have failed to get “any employment”. In short, using a context of a lawyer seeking the designation as ‘senior lawyer’ you tried to cast aspersions on all those who speak for the ordinary citizens of the country.  We wonder, if you, from the chair of a judge would accept such an explanation. It would have been proper for you to withdraw your uncharitable remarks and apologize for your inadvertence.  What was the judicial rationale behind your comment? Continue reading Citizens for Democracy Writes Open Letter to CJI Protesting “Cockroach” Remarks

The Missing Link – How the Great Democracy Robbery Was Conducted

A fundamental mistake is being made by many well-meaning people with respect to the West Bengal election results, For instance, many people are comparing the votes deleted in the farcical “SIR” exercise with the loss of roughly that same amount of votes in TMC’s “final” tally. The closeness of these two figures  – 27 lakhs in the case of deletions (under the logical discrepancy category, though the actual figure should be much higher), and the decrease in TMCs vote  – still falls far short of the BJPs 2.92 crores or so. If one goes by the “final figures” provided by the ECI, the TMC got only 2.60 crores in comparison suggesting that the BJP would have won hands down, even without “SIR”.
Of course all those trying to normalize the big fraud that elections have progressively become since 2019, intentionally or innocently,  also routine resort to such so-called “final figures”. The Godi Media is the biggest player in this heist of the public mind and it has been ably playing this role this time too.

Continue reading The Missing Link – How the Great Democracy Robbery Was Conducted

The Making of the Apolitical Dentist: How Professional Training Erases Power and Politics : Malu Mohan

When I joined Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, in 2000, as an 18-year-old, I arrived with more confidence than clarity. I came from Government Women’s College, where politics was everywhere, in classrooms, corridors, and canteens. Like many of my peers, I leaned towards left politics, without having even a rudimentary understanding of the ideology. But I had grown up believing one thing quite firmly: in a democracy, being apolitical was not an option.

Continue reading The Making of the Apolitical Dentist: How Professional Training Erases Power and Politics : Malu Mohan

The Indian Nation State and Its Discontents: Ravindra K. Jain

Guest post by RAVINDRA K. JAIN

ABSTRACT

The nation-state that is the Indian Union comprises a diversity of socio-cultural minorities and a ruling majority. The decoupling of nation and state highlights a contradiction rather than the integration of socio-cultural diversities and political functions of governance. This contradiction is marked by a double deficit of democracy, namely, authoritarianism and citizenship. A potted history of three phases of modern India explores the roots, symptoms and provenance of this democratic deficit in the present conjuncture.

Keywords Apologetic patriotism; nation state and state-nation; late colonial, early post colonial and Hindutva phases; nationalism and social polity; caste, class and power.

I analyse the Indian State sociologically in three phases of continuous chronological succession: A. The Late Colonial, B. The Paternal post-colonial and C. The current Hindutva. Each phase is characterized by a dual deficit: authoritarianism and citizenship. In order to elucidate the origin and perpetuation of this dual deficit, I would delve into the potted history of each phase. Continue reading The Indian Nation State and Its Discontents: Ravindra K. Jain

सत्य के अन्वेषी और ‘अंधेरे की आदत’ वाला समाज

…… ‘समाजवादियों ने हिन्दू राष्ट्र को किस तरह मुमकिन बनाया ?’

..समाजवादी धारा की यह परिणति भारत की वाम शक्तियों के सामने भी कुछ सवाल निश्चित ही खड़े करती है।

अगर 60 के दशक में समाजवादी धारा के अग्रणी कांग्रेस को शिकस्त देने के लिए ‘शैतान के साथ भी हाथ मिलाने को तैयार होने’ की बात रख रहे थे, पहले उपचुनावों में और बाद में राज्य विधानसभा के चुनावों में भारतीय जनसंघ के साथ मंच साझा कर रहे थे, गठबंधन कायम कर रहे थे, उन उथल पुथल के दिनों में वाम की शक्तियों का क्या रूख था ?

क्या उन्होंने गैर कांग्रेसवाद के नाम पर संघ-भारतीय जनसंघ को वैधता दिलाने वाली सियासत का उसूली आधार पर विरोध किया या नहीं ? कहीं ऐसा तो नहीं कि अस्पष्टता के चलते या urgency के भाव के चलते मौन ही रहे ,  उसी ‘सिद्धांत’ से हमकदम चलते रहे ?

क्या हमारे लिए यह आत्मपरीक्षण का विषय होना नहीं चाहिए कि आपातकाल के बाद जिन जयप्रकाश नारायण को दूसरा महात्मा कहा गया था, यहां तक कि आपातकालविरोधी संघर्ष को ‘दूसरी आज़ादी’ के नाम से महिमामंडित किया गया था, जिसने एक तरह से पहली दफा राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ को वैधता दिलायी, नयी  स्वीकृति प्रदान की और केन्द्रीय मंत्रिमंडल में भी स्थान दिलवाया, उस जयप्रकाश नारायण को लेकर कम्युनिस्टों का रूख क्यों बहुत अस्पष्ट रहा ?

किसी परिघटना को समझने में हमारी भूल हो सकती है, किसी व्यक्ति-संगठन की असलियत जानने में हम गड़बड़ी कर सकते हैं, लेकिन यह बात समझ से परे है कि राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ, उसके पीछे की फासीवादी प्रेरणाएं या स्वाधीनतापूर्व आन्दोलन तथा स्वाधीनता के बाद के आंदोलनों में उनकी निरंतर विवादास्पद भूमिका पर विस्तार से तथ्य पेश किए जाते रहने के बावजूद बाद के दिनों में क्या फौरी राजनीतिक लाभ के नाम पर उसके आनुषंगिक संगठनों के साथ जुड़ने से परहेज करने में प्रगतिशील ताकतें, वाम की शक्तियां सचेत रह पायीं ?.. ( Read the full text here : https://nayapath.in/seekers-of-truth-by-subhash-gatade/)

‘Our wages were stolen and we forced a correction’ – NOIDA workers: Anumeha Yadav

Guest post by ANUMEHA YADAV

NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh: At 8 am, an hour before factories would start work. Maina Devi* waited for her company bus on the sidewalk next to a large warehouse in Phase 2 of Noida’s industrial area.

Way to NOIDA SEZ, image Anumeha Yadav/The Migration Story

It had been a week since she and hundreds of workers from multiple factories on the borders of Delhi stopped work for four days protesting low wages and difficult work conditions. Several factories still had visible damages. Amid the continued police presence, fresh notices on factory gates reassuring workers of revised wages, Devi was heading to work, her thumb in a fresh bandage.

Maina Devi before rushing off to work, image Anumeha Yadav/ The Migration Story

Continue reading ‘Our wages were stolen and we forced a correction’ – NOIDA workers: Anumeha Yadav

‘India, China and the New World Order : Is the Onus on India to Change and Adapt?’ – Chandran Nair

https://youtu.be/zwuv8g-SP5s

Democracy Dialogues Series 43

Organised by New Socialist Initiative

Theme : 

India, China and the New World Order : Is the Onus on India to Change and Adapt?’

Speaker :
Chandran Nair
Author, Thinker and Political Analyst
Founder and CEO of the Global Institute For Tomorrow (GIFT)

Abstract:
In a conversational and interactive mode, the speaker will broadly be covering the following aspects of the theme:

1. Neighbourhood, Geopolitics, New World Order – The troubled relations between the two Asian giants have, by now, a history of several decades. In India, the constraints of domestic politics (largely flowing from liberal democracy and competitive electoral politics) appear to make it difficult for the Indian rulers to serve India’s strategic interests and to formulate an appropriate foreign policy. How should India deal with the strategic challenges arising from the emerging New World Order?

2. Political Economy for India – India is often projected to emerge as the next economic powerhouse of the world, but the facts on ground pose many challenges. The path to export-led growth as traversed by China appears to be closed for India. Furthermore, a strong State that can guide and force private capital to work in national interest is impossible in the liberal democratic and capitalist India. How to visualize a political economy suitable for India?

3. Woes of Liberal Democracy – Competitive electoral politics often activates the social, religious and sectarian fault lines of Indian society. It has, for example, paved the ground for the rise of the Hindutva forces. What can be done about such challenges thrown up by liberal democracy?

4. Civilizational Discourse – China and India are often cited as the two glorious and largest ancient civilizations. China is cited as the civilizational state that has managed to tame modernity for its own ends. How can India accomplish something similar in its own way?

Speaker :
Chandran Nair is the founder and CEO of the Global Institute for Tomorrow, an independent Pan-Asian think tank that explores the dynamic relationship among business, society, and the state, as well as the rules governing global capitalism

Nair was born in Malaysia, he studied chemical engineering in the UK, at 28, he joined the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, later earned a master’s degree in environmental engineering from Bangkok.

He has authored / co authored many books, here is a representative list of his publications : Understanding China : Governance, Socio-Economics, Global Influence (2026) ;  Dismantling Global White Privilege : Equity for a Post-Western World (2022) ; The Sustainable State: The Future of Government, Economy, and Society (2018) ; Consumptionomics: Asia’s Role in Reshaping Capitalism and Saving the Planet  (2011) ;  

He is also the creator of The Other Hundred, a non-profit global photo journalism initiative to present a counterpoint to media consensus on some of today’s most important issues.

Chandran was chairman of Environmental Resources Management (ERM) in Asia Pacific until 2004, establishing the company as Asia’s leading environmental consultancy.

Chandran has served as Adjunct Professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore. He is a Member of the Executive Committee of The Club of Rome and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.

Principal’s endorsement of Women’s Reservation Bill on a party platform unacceptable: Statement by LSR students

Public statement by LSR students

The students of Lady Shri Ram College for Women—a large number of them filling the area outside auditorium, the corridor, the entire staircase and many even outside under the sun—started the protest not because we are against the Women’s Reservation Bill, but because the video of the Principal of the college was posted on the BJP4India official Instagram page. As a college that touts that it is apolitical and does not allow students to organise political events, the students found this extremely hypocritical. In the 15 minutes of the claimed “transparent dialogue” that happened yesterday, we were told by the Principal that she recorded the video for the Ministry of Women and Child Development and that it was posted on the BJP4India page without her consent. On further questions about if she contacted the page regarding it being posted without her consent, she said, “No”. Continue reading Principal’s endorsement of Women’s Reservation Bill on a party platform unacceptable: Statement by LSR students

India in the World – Mostly Through Lens of Iran War – Ravi Sinha

Theme :India in the World – Mostly Through Lens of Iran War

Speaker : Ravi Sinha

Abstract :
The unipolar world that came into existence at the end of the Cold War is on the way out and a new world order, potentially a multipolar one, is in the offing. This epochal change, as evidenced in the miraculous rise of China and the re-emergence of Russia on the world stage, appears to have gained acceleration with the war in West Asia in which the Iranian nation has handed an astonishingly courageous response to the aggressors. A broad framework to understand this epochal transition was presented in a study group by Comrade Ravi Sinha

Part 1 of this video contains the basic presentation followed by further elaboration of the argument in the Q/A session in Part 2.
New Socialist Initiative (NSI)

‘सत्य को बयां करने के रास्ते की मुश्किलों के बारे में’ क्या लेखक सचेत और सक्रिय हैं?

(जनवादी लेखक संघ, दिल्ली के 10 वें राज्य सम्मेलन (4 अप्रैल 2026)  में प्रस्तुत वक्तव्य का संशोधित एवं विस्तारित रूप, सम्मेलन के विचार सत्र का फोकस था : हमारा समय और लेखक की भूमिका)

प्रस्तावना

हम एक नाजु़क वक्त़ से गुजर रहे हैं।

कोई भी प्रबुद्ध व्यक्ति – जो न्याय, अमन और बराबरी की चाहत रखता हो, समूची मानवता को तरक्की के रास्ते पर ले जाना चाहता हो, यह दावा नहीं कर सकता कि उनमें से किसी ने भी इस बात का तसव्वुर भी किया होगा कि 21 वीं सदी की तीसरी दहाई में हम ऐसे दौर से रूबरू होंगे।

एक ऐसा दौर जहां हम और वे की सियासत उरूज पर दिख रही है, आबादी के अच्छे खासे हिस्से को अमनुष्य घोषित करना, दीमक, कीड़ों, मकौड़ों की श्रेणी में शुमार करना एक सम्मानित उद्यम में रूपांतरित हुआ है। नागरिक शुद्धता की कवायदों के जरिए – अवांछितों को, अधर्मियों को, असहमतों को -गणतंत्र के दायरों से भी बाहर सरहद पार मुल्कों के बियाबान में ढकेल देने की मुहिमों पर इन्साफ के रखवाले कहे गए संस्थानों से भी मुहर लग रही है।

इस खत़रनाक समय को अलग-अलग ढंग से परिभाषित किया जा रहा है। 

कोई कहता है कि यह ऐसा दौर है जब यह प्रतीत हो रहा है कि समूचा समाज एक उन्मादी खुशी के साथ एक गर्त में जा रहा है और उसे इस बात का कोई इल्म भी नहीं है।

मेरे एक मित्र – जो एक प्रख्यात मार्क्सवादी  विचारक हैं – कहते हैं, यह ऐसा दौर है जब समाज को गोया अंधेरे की आदत हो गयी है, मद्धिम सी रौशनी से भी उसकी आंखें चुंधिया जाती हैं। ( Read the full text here : https://janchowk.com/is-the-author-aware-ofand-actively-engaged-withthe-difficulties-inherent-in-the-path-of-articulating-the-truth/)

Deified Bodies, Diminished Rights – A Critical Anatomy of the ‘Divyang’ Discourse: Viraj Kafle

Guest Post by VIRAJ KAFLE 

The landscape of disability rights in India underwent a seismic shift on December 27, 2015, not through a legislative amendment or a landmark judicial decree, but via a radio broadcast. During his Mann Ki Baat program, Prime Minister Narendra Modi suggested that the term viklang be replaced with divyang. While ostensibly a move to alter societal mindsets and reduce stigma, this nomenclature shift signaled a profound reorientation of the state’s relationship with its disabled citizenry. This declaration of “divinity” arrived a full year before the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act of 2016 was actually passed, effectively setting a paternalistic tone for the rights-based framework that followed.

By invoking “divinity” to describe physical or sensory impairments, the discourse moved disability from a hard-won, rights-based framework into a deified, body-focused model that prioritizes symbolic elevation over material accessibility. As disability activist Nidhi Goyal has argued, this is merely a new way to tell the disabled they are “not normal”—moving them from “abnormal” to “supernormal,” but never simply equal. It is generally accepted that to be disabled is to be “disabled by society,” yet the divyang narrative replaces this political recognition with an abject surrender to divinity that reflects a forced consent of the disabled to their own marginalization. Continue reading Deified Bodies, Diminished Rights – A Critical Anatomy of the ‘Divyang’ Discourse: Viraj Kafle

RSS at 100: Caste, Savarkar, and the real roots of RSS | The Federal

Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay speaks with Subhash Gatade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpgQi1LaRgo

In The Federal’s ‘RSS at 100’ series, Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay speaks with Subhash Gatade, author of Godse’s Children and Modinama, about the deeper social roots of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Gatade argues that the RSS must be understood not just through Hindu-Muslim politics, but through the caste churn in Maharashtra, the challenge posed by Jyotiba Phule’s anti-caste movement, and the predominance of Brahmin leadership within the organisation. The discussion also examines Savarkar’s influence, Golwalkar’s ideology, the RSS-Hindu Mahasabha relationship, and the strategic shift towards ‘inclusive Hindutva’ in later decades.

Zero Tolerance or Restorative Justice? Althea responds to ZeTo

The ZeTo campaign organisers responded to Althea’s concerns expressed in an earlier post. We are delighted by and thankful for their willingness to dialogue, for we do believe that such an exchange of views is absolutely necessary for common ground to evolve on this issue, precisely because our readings of the political and social present in Kerala, are different.

Continue reading Zero Tolerance or Restorative Justice? Althea responds to ZeTo

Zero Tolerance, Democratic Responsibility, and the Question of Feminist Praxis: MJ Vijayan

Guest post by MJ Vijayan

The recent statement issued by members of the Althea Feminist Friendship Collective on the forthcoming Zero Tolerance (ZeTo) campaign in Kerala[1] deserves a serious and thoughtful response. I hope it will not be taken as a hostile document. Far from that, it is, in many ways, an anxious one – anxious about the state, about punitive excess, about the global history of ‘zero tolerance’ policies and campaigns, and about the risk of reinforcing authoritarian or brahminical patriarchies in the name of justice.

Those anxieties are not frivolous. Feminist history teaches us to be wary of state power. Yet feminist history also teaches us that structures do not shift without public contestation, moral clarity, and organised political pressure.

As a cis male articulating within feminist and progressive left traditions, I do so with caution. I am conscious that feminism is not my intellectual inheritance to define. It is a movement and epistemology built by women and gender minorities through struggle, often against men like me. Yet it is precisely because feminism is not merely identity but political practice that it demands engagement across genders, including critical engagement. Continue reading Zero Tolerance, Democratic Responsibility, and the Question of Feminist Praxis: MJ Vijayan

Response to the Zero Tolerance Campaign against Sexual Violence in Kerala: Althea Women ‘s Friendship




Althea supports DrAsha Achy Joseph’s efforts to oppose the shielding of powerful men so that they may get away with the most egregious sexual violence and harassment.


  However, we are wary of the implications of ‘zero tolerance’, given its ambiguous global history. Zero tolerance is not the same as “ending gender-based violence.” It can very quickly devolve into a superficial checkbox for institutions that sounds good on paper and in theory.

Continue reading Response to the Zero Tolerance Campaign against Sexual Violence in Kerala: Althea Women ‘s Friendship

Bangladesh in Transition – Understanding Election in the Aftermath of the July Uprising : Sohul Ahmed

Guest post by SOHUL AHMED

[We bring for our readers, this essay by Sohul Ahmed, which details the context and background of the recently held Bangladesh election. Though a cacophony of voices from the Right to the Left in India had already pronounced their  shared judgement of an “Islamic takeover” of Bangladesh via the July Uprising, what this essay details the extremely significant political process through which the July Charter was formulated, signed on to by 33 parties, and how the most orderly and peaceful election was held in the country just two weeks ago.  This article rebuts the general impression created by this Right-Left propaganda in India that supreme chaos reigns in Bangladesh. Since this article was written, a new government has been formed with a Hindu  and a Chakma-Buddhist face each, in the cabinet. The main Islamic party has been trounced in the elections. So much for all the doomsday prophesies about post-July Bangladesh. That does not mean everything is fine – and Ahmed explains the complications that still exist. – AN]

Bangladesh elections, representational image, courtesy Reuters/ BBC

Bangladesh stands at a crucial juncture in its political transition following the July Uprising. The country witnessed its national election almost one and a half years after the ousting of Sheikh Hasina’s autocratic regime – an election widely regarded as one of the most consequential moments in the country’s political history. Our characterization of this election as “crucial” or even “historic” has deep roots in Bangladesh’s recent electoral experience. Continue reading Bangladesh in Transition – Understanding Election in the Aftermath of the July Uprising : Sohul Ahmed